POLL: Obama's visit just bounced off Reid (7% more likely to vote for Reid)

Las Vegas Review Journal ^ | February 28, 2010 | STEVE TETREAULT

[maine-iac7]

17% LESS likely

should have been included in your title - let's not do half truths like the lib media...

[maine-iac7]

So typical of the marxist media to make the headline of the story as giving Reid a bump of 7%,

It wasn't the marxist media - the '7%' was NOT in the headline - the poster here added that

[Think free or die]

"We need to get this guy to campaign for EVERY rodent up this year !"

Yes, Yes!!! Come campaign for Benedict Arlen - or Sestak!!!! And even Representative Schwartz!

[maine-iac7]

Please, Please, Please, Obamama, go to San Francisco and stump for San Fran Nan, Pleeeezzzeee.

[El Cid]

I’d like to know more about the 75 percent, who realized “no effect” on their view.

Probably people who were already planning to vote against Reid. Obama's visit wouldn't effect their views since they didn't have the option to change their vote from 'No' on Reid to 'Hell No' on Reid ....

[WOSG]

Poll equivalent of a Dead cat bounce.

[married21]

“House goes GOP for sure”

---

Here in CA, I haven’t seen serious Republican challengers for the incumbents in the LA area. Without well-funded, credible challengers, the incumbents will win again. The only challenger to our Member of Congress, Jane Harman, seems to be a more progressive candidate.

Has anybody from FR ever run for office and/or run somebody else’s campaign? How did it go?