To: NYer
How do we know that the poor chap didn’t first confess his sins and receive absolution? We are all assuming quite a bit here. Even the priest, no?
To: sydney smith
In this case, the guy seems to have pranced up to the front of the Church claiming that his intrinsically disordered life was in fact good and holy: refusing him Communion would have been perfectly defensible even if he had just stepped out of the confessional.
To: sydney smith
We are all assuming quite a bit here. Even the priest, no? He would have had to approach the priest for the Sacrament of Reconciliation, no?
20 posted on
02/25/2010 10:58:11 AM PST by
NYer
("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
To: sydney smith
How do we know that the poor chap didnt first confess his sins and receive absolution? We are all assuming quite a bit here. Even the priest, no?
I sincerely hope you're joking.
Ye shall know them by their fruit.
In this case, the man himself was a fruit, and the fact that he managed to raise a stink about this afterword is evidence of his unrepentant heart--i.e., he did not confess his sins.
To: sydney smith
The carnival prince?
Or the pleasant man who attempted to hijack the mass?
It seems the priests knew beforehand they were being targeted by activists.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson