Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: suspects

I just emailed Graham and pointed out that Brown has called himself a “fiscal conservative,” making Graham’s thesis invalid. (He asks “When did he ever call himself a “conservative.”)

Graham emailed me back with his straw man argument: “Brown is “Conservative” for Massachusetts. What did you expect Ron Paul...”

So all the Senators who voted Nay (i.e. RINO McCain and Dem Ben Nelson) are Ron Paulnuts? Graham’s thesis and argument does not hold water. He is a fraud like Brown.


19 posted on 02/25/2010 5:52:52 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nhwingut
-- I just emailed Graham and pointed out that Brown has called himself a "fiscal conservative," making Graham's thesis invalid. --

I'm surprised Graham didn't justify his thesis on the ground that Brown didn't call himself a conservative Republican (which is what Graham's thesis is based on).

Another approach, one that is most common among the party faithful, is to redefine "fiscal conservative" as "borrowing and wasting 15 billion when the other guy wanted to waste more."

20 posted on 02/25/2010 6:01:37 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut

Just FYI, FReeper ‘suspects’ = Michael Graham


21 posted on 02/25/2010 6:25:04 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson