Posted on 02/23/2010 6:27:28 AM PST by truthandlife
resident Obama presented a new health care plan on Monday that calls for raising the Medicare payroll tax on some households earning less than $250,000, an apparent breach of his campaign pledge not to raise taxes on families earning less than that amount. The presidents plan also calls for increasing taxes on interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents.
In a Sept. 12, 2008 campaign speech in Dover, N.H, Obama said: And I can make a firm pledge: Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 will see their taxes increasenot your income taxes, not your payroll taxes, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.
But the new health care plan released in summary form yesterday by the White House specifically calls for increasing the Medicare payroll tax on households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly.
Unless President Obama is prepared to say that the only type of family that qualifies as a family under his tax pledge is one that is formed around a "married couple filing jointly" than his new health care proposal violates his 2008 tax pledge on its face. The Internal Revenue Service, for example, makes clear that the head of household tax filing status is for unmarried taxpayers. A definition of the term head of household on the IRS Web site says: Generally, you may claim head of household filing status on your tax return only if you are unmarried and pay more than 50% of the costs of keeping up a home for yourself and your dependent(s) or other qualifying individuals.
The White House posted the presidents tax increase proposal as part of the summary of the new health-care reform bill he is proposing.
Under current law, workers who earn a salary pay a flat tax of 1.45 percent of their wages to support the Medicare Hospital Insurance (HI) trust fund, but those who have substantial unearned income do not, raising issues of fairness, says the summary of Title IX of the presidents proposal. The Act will include an additional 0.9 percentage point Hospital Insurance tax for households with incomes exceeding $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly. In addition, it would add a 2.9 percent tax for such high-income households to unearned income including interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents (excluding income from active participation in S corporations).
Last August, after Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers appeared on Sunday talk shows and seemed to float the possibility that Obama would violate his campaign promise by raising taxes on people earning less than $250,000, White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs repeatedly and emphatically said that they president had made a commitment not to do so. At that time, Gibbs did not speak of the presidents tax pledge as if it applied only to families, but said the president had made a commitment not to raise taxes on those making less than $250,000 a year.
Let me be precise: The president's clear commitment is not to raise taxes on those making less than $250,000 a year, Gibbs said at the Aug. 3 White House press briefing.
When reporters pressed him on the issue, Gibbs said: I am reiterating the president's clear commitment in the clearest terms possible, that hes not raising taxes on those who make less than $250,000 a year.
BOHICA!
The situation is worse than we thought, etc. etc.
If it opens it’s mouth, it LIES!
Move on people there is nothing to see here, just another lie from mac daddy being exposed.
Many, many more to come so get used to it, his entire life is one massive lie.
SET THEIR LOCAL AND DC LINES ON FIRE!
Sen. Scot Brown's number is 202-224-5443
Capitol Hill switchboard is 202-224-3121
Lots of local demwit phone numbers on this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2408217/posts
Rename, repackage, rewrite it a tad smaller, and sell another pig in a poke.
Tennessee has joined several other states in trying to pass a Health Care Freedom Act. NO COLAs for granny, retired Military or retired fed employees. BIG NEW fees for Tricare for Life retired over 65 Military's secondary health ins. (DOD bill already passed, delayed but goes into effect 2011)
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/10/military_tricarefees_blocked_100709w/
New Dem mantra: Woof, woof eat dog food granny....ala let them eat cake.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Obama says slight fix will extend Social Security
http://townhall.com/news/us/2010/02/19/obama_says_slight_fix_will_extend_social_security
Health Care Rationing for Seniors Another Problem in New Obama Plan
http://www.lifenews.com/bio3058.html
TRI CARE FOR LIFE This from a google search:
http://economicspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/05/tricare-for-life-is-obama-trying-to.html
This option would help reduce the costs of TFL, as well as costs for Medicare, by introducing minimum out-of pocket requirements for beneficiaries. Under this option, TFL would not cover any of the first $525 of an enrollees cost-sharing liabilities for calendar year 2011 and would limit coverage to 50 percent of the next $4,725 in Medicare cost sharing that the beneficiary incurred. (Because all further cost sharing would be covered by TFL, enrollees could not pay more than $2,888 in cost sharing in that year.)
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9925/12-18-HealthOptions.pdf
http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/hcva09/hcva110609-1.htm
Bill Would Restrict Veterans Health Care Options 11/06/09
Buyer and McKeon Offer Amendments to Protect Veterans and TRICARE Beneficiaries
Congress plans to block Tricare fee increases
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/10/military_tricarefees_blocked_100709w
By Rick Maze - Staff writer, Oct 7, 2009
Tricare fee increases imposed last week by the Defense Department will be repealed by a provision of the compromise 2010 defense authorization bill unveiled Wednesday by House and Senate negotiators.
Snip
The fee increases were announced on Sept. 30 and took effect on Oct. 1, but the defense bill, HR 2647, includes a provision barring any fee increases until the start of fiscal 2011.
Snip
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Bill Matz, president of the National Association for Uniformed Services, said the announcement of fee increases was shocking considering that the Obama administration promised earlier this year to hold off on any new fee Tricare fee increases until fiscal 2011.
President Obama and DoD assured NAUS and the entire military family earlier this year that there would rightly be no increases in any Tricare fees in fiscal 2010, Matz said. We took them at their word, and I cant believe that a co-pay increase like this was allowed to go forward, he added.
Bambi doesn't keep his promises...so buyer beware.
Expect the economy to weaken and jobs to disappear.
Outstanding!! I just love this
Yup, he is doing a good job of that.
I worked real hard at not giving you a tax increase...harder than anything I’ve ever worked at in my life....
Me too! His mis-steps will insure that he’s one-term ZerObama. He was very emphatic about NOT raising taxes and this could be his “Read my lips...” moment.
Don’t you love the term “UNEARNED INCOME”
(You didn’t “do anything” to get it, so give the govt most of it)
excellent!
If it opens its mouth, it LIES!
I trust absolutely nothing about this evil man.
That's about right. Let's evict this guy.
“Bambi doesn’t keep his promises...so buyer beware.”
Sadly, at this juncture, “news” that Obama is breaking yet another promise is pretty much a dog-bites-man story. Yawn.
We could spare a lot of trees and bandwidth if the media simply focused on reporting the rare instances in which Obama has kept his promises.
Words and sentences are not meant to convey meaning, much less intent, for the Poseur... rather they represent a stream of emotional consciousness designed to envelope the specific audience in the desired feelings. It worked during the campaign but is rapidly losing its effectiveness as people see the chaotic results of his actions.
Read my cheeks...
“it would add a 2.9 percent tax for such high-income households to unearned income including interest, dividends,”
What? Would that be like the 4th time these items would be taxed? By the time you get a dividend, it must me like the 10 cents leftovers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.