Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn

No congressman/woman has power to impeach Obama, unless he violates a particular law severely and clearly worthy of impeachment, or behaves so irreprehensibly as Clinton or others in WH. The “O” isn’t going to do that, as he intends to bankrupt us...it is political and financial terrorism...look at the last appointment to middle east. What is controversy on this appointee...that he is a sympathizer with jhadists! Think about it. Why was he, of all people, appointed to that position.


16 posted on 02/16/2010 6:53:07 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kackikat
The object of the obama admin. is obvious, as you say, total financial ruin. It is intentional.

I believe the obama/soros goal is one world marxist government built on the ashes of the USA.

This nation is all that is stopping the global government. We are the last great hope for world freedom.

Can anyone stop the marxists? They are fully in the drivers seat.

26 posted on 02/16/2010 7:06:28 PM PST by exnavy (May the Lord grant our troops protection and endurance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Kackikat
"No congressman/woman has power to impeach Obama, unless he violates a particular law severely and clearly worthy of impeachment, or behaves so irreprehensibly as Clinton or others in WH."

Actually, it's just like a lawsuit, any member can introduce a resolution of impeachment at any time, just as anyone can lodge a lawsuit against you at any time. Then the members can argue about whether it meets the criteria. Once they do that and impeachment is approved, it's time for the trial in the Senate. And there it's supposed to be a matter of the burden-of-proof, which for impeachment is very low, amounting to "do we trust this guy anymore" (unlike civil law, in which the goal-line is a preponderance of evidence, and criminal law, in which the goal-line is guilt-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt).

Any member could lodge a resolution of impeachment today. It's worth pondering why they don't.
68 posted on 02/16/2010 7:53:32 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Kackikat

As I understand, If the house brings articles of impeachment and he is found guilty then that is it. I have never seen that it hinges on violation of some particular law..

Incompetence is sufficient, if the Congress decides to give him the boot


130 posted on 02/17/2010 4:15:21 AM PST by flash2368
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson