To: kristinn
No congressman/woman has power to impeach Obama, unless he violates a particular law severely and clearly worthy of impeachment, or behaves so irreprehensibly as Clinton or others in WH. The “O” isn’t going to do that, as he intends to bankrupt us...it is political and financial terrorism...look at the last appointment to middle east. What is controversy on this appointee...that he is a sympathizer with jhadists! Think about it. Why was he, of all people, appointed to that position.
16 posted on
02/16/2010 6:53:07 PM PST by
Kackikat
(There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
To: Kackikat
The object of the obama admin. is obvious, as you say, total financial ruin. It is intentional.
I believe the obama/soros goal is one world marxist government built on the ashes of the USA.
This nation is all that is stopping the global government. We are the last great hope for world freedom.
Can anyone stop the marxists? They are fully in the drivers seat.
26 posted on
02/16/2010 7:06:28 PM PST by
exnavy
(May the Lord grant our troops protection and endurance.)
To: Kackikat
"No congressman/woman has power to impeach Obama, unless he violates a particular law severely and clearly worthy of impeachment, or behaves so irreprehensibly as Clinton or others in WH."
Actually, it's just like a lawsuit, any member can introduce a resolution of impeachment at any time, just as anyone can lodge a lawsuit against you at any time. Then the members can argue about whether it meets the criteria. Once they do that and impeachment is approved, it's time for the trial in the Senate. And there it's supposed to be a matter of the burden-of-proof, which for impeachment is very low, amounting to "do we trust this guy anymore" (unlike civil law, in which the goal-line is a preponderance of evidence, and criminal law, in which the goal-line is guilt-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt).
Any member could lodge a resolution of impeachment today. It's worth pondering why they don't.
68 posted on
02/16/2010 7:53:32 PM PST by
RightOnTheLeftCoast
(Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
To: Kackikat
As I understand, If the house brings articles of impeachment and he is found guilty then that is it. I have never seen that it hinges on violation of some particular law..
Incompetence is sufficient, if the Congress decides to give him the boot
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson