” It’s been touted here several times.”
That was a lot of effort just to reiterate that the shortcomings of Conservapedia demonstrate that Wikipedia is just fine.
Nonsense.
“I would rather be working with more complete information than a paltry little bit that I found over at Conservapedia.”
I’d rather do without the leftist slant. I don’t care how long or “complete” an article is, if a liblib had a hand in producing it, it cannot be relied upon.
I’d rather do without the leftist slant. I don’t care how long or “complete” an article is, if a liblib had a hand in producing it, it cannot be relied upon.
Well, I can deal with, very easily (without breaking a sweat) the 1% existence of any liberal philosophy inserted in a sentence or a paragraph in some articles. That's no problem for me at all.
And from what I see on Free Republic, from the various other FReepers, posting information and articles from Wikipedia on the various threads... they seem to be able to deal with it just fine.
But, by all means -- if you have difficulty sorting it out... stay away from it... LOL...
In the meantime, I'm not throwing out a source of encyclopedic information in which I can use 99% of the information for all sorts of subjects -- for any 1% of information that may have some slant...
I don't engage in the practice of "throwing the baby out with the bath water..." :-)