Posted on 02/12/2010 4:03:45 AM PST by Michael van der Galien
Wasn’t the “privacy issue” the basis for the Roe v. Wade decision?
If there is no longer a “reasonable expectation of privacy”, shouldn’t that mark the end of Abortion On Demand?
Invade our privacy will you?
This is just going to increase voter “amorphous moodiness” against you.
Where are all the liberals who were screaming about invasion of privacy when Bush was President??
Well, king obuma just lost the 18 to 29 year-old vote.
All he’s got left is fractured brain professors, poodle-walking New York city metrosexuals and inner city thugs who call mothers, sisters and wives “Hos.”
How’s that hope and change working for you, obuma? You’re well on your way to becoming “The most hated man of his time.”
Pardon my French, but....
BULL-F***ING S**T, YOU KENYAN JERKOFF!!!!!!!
Exactly my thought too. FUBO, FU to he**!
The media is of course silent, because their messiah who they elected can do no wrong.
Reason enough for another Tea Party demonstration on the Mall of Washington DC this Spring.
GOD will see this law removed one day. I agree with your post.
LLS
The USSC, at that time, wasn’t interested in reasoning ~ they just wanted to do it ~ like their doctor daddy’s before them had paid for their law training by aborting surplus rich kids.
Phone companies could solve this problem by just telling the customers that they will keep this information private. Then the customers would have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
It’s a chicken-and-egg thing.
Unfortunately, the phone companies are all too willing to sell us out. They don’t realize that privacy is a selling point.
Barack Sez: There is no right to privacy except as expressed in Roe v Wade.
I am sure there will be an exception for “undocumented workers” telephones.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves." William Pitt in the House of Commons November 18, 1783
Make it the 3rd week of April and I ‘ll be there!
Barack Obama: You Have “No Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy”
How’s that “hope and change” treating you? No surprise now that the Marxist-Commies would resort to old fashioned KGB-Stasi tactics. They have already high-jacked MSM to the equivalent of the old Soviet propaganda tool Pravda. If these bums aren’t stopped re-education camps will be on the horizon.
The left hated Bush for trying to update wiretapping laws to accommodate the modern world of multiple access points.
The left will love Obama for tracking their every move on their iPhone.
I often think of creating false trails, like the eventuality of making the obnoxious Onstar portable and having it in an easy to remove case in my vehicle.
When I wish I take it out and consider some diabolical event like having it on a flotation device sent down river, or stuffed in a carcass of of meat and left out in the woods for the wolves to drag around.
And the cellphone? Hook it up with a tape recorder with messages about where to place the bombs in Farsi, tie it to balloons filled with helium and let go.
The more I hear of government suppression of freedom and liberty the more aggressive I feel about being counter revolutionary.
Onstar - yet another reason not to by a General Motors car.
BTW, there are certain defense related facilities that prohibit transmitting devices (cell phones, WiFi, etc) due to security reasons. Would this then prohibit a Government Motors product from being in the vehicle pool?
But how many terms as “Chairman”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.