Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama: You Have “No Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy”
David Horowitz's NewsRealblog ^ | Liz Blaine

Posted on 02/12/2010 4:03:45 AM PST by Michael van der Galien

CNET was the first to report on prospective tracking of American citizens using cell phone technology, but this week Barack Obama becomes the Dark Knight himself, seizing the opportunity to spy on every American through unfettered access to their cell phone records, physical locations and internet use.

In the movie the Dark Knight, Batman uses cell phone technology to spy on the citizens of Gotham, following their every move in his quest to locate his nemesis. On Friday, the Obama administration will argue in federal court for the right, without a court-ordered warrant, to gain access to cellular provider records documenting the time and location American citizens place cell phone calls. I know you’re thinking, “But what about my Constitutional rights against search and seizure?” Those rights will no longer exist. The Obama administration is advocating that,

“Warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ whereabouts. U.S. Department of Justice lawyers say that ‘a customer’s Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the phone company reveals to the government its own records’ that show where a mobile device placed and received calls.

But cellular providers record more information than just when and where a call is placed. All cell phones “ping” the closest cell phone towers when not in use, alerting the tower it is within its transmission range, even when it’s turned off. The only way to disconnect a cell phone’s ability to contact the towers is to remove its battery.

Despite the Obama administration’s assertion, I somehow doubt the signers of the Constitution would have agreed there is “no reasonable expectation of privacy.”

(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americainperil; chrismatthews; dnccoupdetat; enemydomestic; islaminside; kenyancoupdetat; kenyanincharge; noaccountability; nobc; nobc4u; noprivacy4u; notransparency; scotusasleep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2010 4:03:46 AM PST by Michael van der Galien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
Fine, you Usurper.

Release your long form birth certificate and college records.

And John Kerry can release his long form SF 180 in full.

Cheers!

2 posted on 02/12/2010 4:04:35 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

It’s true we have rights to privacy with no reasonable expectation they will be protected by our gov’t.


3 posted on 02/12/2010 4:06:38 AM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
Obama, you should have every expectation of being a ONE TERM PRESIDENT.
4 posted on 02/12/2010 4:06:49 AM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 115)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
If there is NO PRIVACY guarantee in the US Constitution... then there can be NO ROE v. WADE! Abortion is illegal at the Federal level... it cannot be both ways.

LLS

5 posted on 02/12/2010 4:07:33 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
Yawn. I see the market for disposable cell phones for criminals and terrorists picking up now.

As always, it is the law-abiding people who are screwed the most.

6 posted on 02/12/2010 4:08:10 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

I’m sure the same liberal groups that screamed about George W. Bush and The Patriot Act will also scream about this invasion of privacy by Hussein. sarc/

What’s that I hear from the left? The sound of crickets?


7 posted on 02/12/2010 4:08:50 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (The first American Revolution started in Massachusetts. So did the second one, on January 19, 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Now you're getting it.

Letting the Leftwingtards focus on beating down "privacy rights" allows further undercutting of their right to kill babies.

They face a dilemma ~ do they want the dead bodies more than they want to know how you use your cellphone.

8 posted on 02/12/2010 4:09:59 AM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

If Obama believes that Americans have not reasonable right to privacy, then when will he allow access to his college records, birth records and everything else?

I.e., do as I say, not as I do.


9 posted on 02/12/2010 4:15:14 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Despair disguised as Hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

Obama did not support warrantless wiretaps of terrorists yet asserts unfettered tracking, tapping, and internet snooping of all Americans. Democrat bureaucrats can be trusted with private records, NOT! Expect leaked embarrassing information and political harassment.


10 posted on 02/12/2010 4:16:16 AM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

Hey Barry, give us the password to your Blackberry, you hypocrite.


11 posted on 02/12/2010 4:19:03 AM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

So under ObamaCare, there will be no expectation of the privacy of medical records either?


12 posted on 02/12/2010 4:22:37 AM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Peons and subjects to tyranny have no rights. This was what the Founding Fathers warned us about. They chip away at our rights daily. They want to rule over us. One way to avoid cellular detection is to take out the batteries to your cell phone until it is needed, otherwise it is a tracking device and sometimes a listening device to be used by the government in any way they see fit.


13 posted on 02/12/2010 4:31:27 AM PST by BipolarBob (Gravity. It's not just the law it's a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

These same idiots had a problem that under Bush’s Administration after 9/11 having international incoming calls wiretapped from prospective terrorists. We’re doomed until we can turn things around in 2012.


14 posted on 02/12/2010 4:32:30 AM PST by growingpains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

That is what I thought. They howled about the wiretaps of overseas terrorists under the Bush Admin.


15 posted on 02/12/2010 4:38:54 AM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

well if W had said this...... he would have been summoned to the congress for an explanation and the press would do it job and fry him... so why not O


16 posted on 02/12/2010 4:40:40 AM PST by gibtx2 (keep up the good work I am out of work but post 20 a month to this out of WF Check)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
Interpol - above the law

The White House - above the law and Constitution

America - Screwed without Impeachment and Conviction


17 posted on 02/12/2010 4:43:01 AM PST by Diogenesis (Alea iacta est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

“No reasonable expectation of privacy”????

Pardon my French, but....

BULL-F***ING S**T, YOU KENYAN JERKOFF!!!!!!!


18 posted on 02/12/2010 4:45:30 AM PST by hoagy62 (Obama: slowly sucking the positive attitude out of the US since 11-4-08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; LibLieSlayer

No, they’ll get it both ways. They’re interested in power and control. This feeds the Leviathan.

Roe v. Wade is bad law and bad legal thinking. Blackmun is a fool, but conservatives were even more foolish to argue against a right to privacy as the attack on Roe. Better to attack Blackmun’s assertion that science cannot tell us when life begins so we’ll side with death.

Americans believe in innocent until proven guilty. This would have been an effective tack to take against an abhorrent and poorly founded ruling.


19 posted on 02/12/2010 4:46:00 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

This (expectation of privacy) is what derailed the Bork SC nomination. Interesting position for the obama supporters now -


20 posted on 02/12/2010 4:48:03 AM PST by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson