[NYer]

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list

[Cyber Liberty]

Should the pro-marriage votes of Catholics, Baptists and other people of faith in California be disregarded as irrational, “discriminatory” and unconstitutional?

Why not? Happens all the time in the Ninth Circus. Overturning voters' initiatives is standard, workaday stuff in that court.

[etradervic]

Only the bigotry of leftists would ever consider this.

[Political Junkie Too]

If this is successful, will we disqualify elections where black candidates lose because the voters were racists? Will we disqualify electios where gay candidates lose because the voters were homophobic? Will we disqualify elections where hispanic candidates lose because the voters were against (illegal) immigration?

Where do these "thought trials" end?

-PJ

[LibFreeUSA]

They should fast track this to the SCOTUS, so they can smack down the leftist radicals. Again!

[Rocky]

The real question is whether the court has a right to even hold this trial in the first place.

[the invisib1e hand]

some bimbo was on John Bachelor last night (w/a guest host) on this subject and yapping that it's "a civil rights issue."

I had to turn the radio off.

[DakotaRed]

They want to play the race card, comparing themselves to Blacks who could not vote in the 1960’s, let’s play it back.

We overturned laws that kept Blacks from voting and now, they desire some sort of new law to prevent religious people from exercising their vote?

[EternalVigilance]

Surreal.

[annalex]

Wondering if Their Votes Counted

That the votes of Californians on either side did not count is now beyond dispute regardless of how the court decides. The votes were invalidated the moment the case was allowed to proceed.

It is now a bunch of lawyers in various roles whose opinions count, not the people's.

[massmike]

Torches and pitchforks time!