The problem here is that plaintiff has standing to make the Establishment Clause case. The federal courts have denied citizens standing to hold the government accountable on most other claims. The standing doctrine is part of the death of a thousand cuts inflicted by the judiciary that has created an unaccountable goverment. So we should be happy there might be some way, even if not a straightforward one, to uncover perhaps the greatest financial crime against the Republic in American history.
Timmy! Timmy Geithner? Is that you, pussyboy?
Thomas More legal team would not take a case that was, as you say, ‘stoooopid.’
They wouldn’t waste time on a case that didn’t have merit.
Thomas More, ACLJ, and other Constitution Defending Attorneys ROCK! If you have an extra few dollars, please contribute to them.
Burn some of it down now or burn all of it down later. The spending is unsustainable. As the Fram oil filter guy used to say... You can pay me now or pay me later. (but either way you WILL pay). Like the fight against militant putting off the inevitable will only cost more lives and treasure in the long run.
Thomas Moore has done more to challenge obuma than most anyone in America.
How about JasonC outline all the legal challenges made by “JasonC” to question the AIG scam and ripoff and bring anyone to justice.
I’ll wait while you line up all your legal claims and present them.
I want to see a court number, Jason C...
Sometimes a man steps in a pile of crap and admits it...sometimes not.
The Establishment Clause is the *only* option to allow this case to proceed. Courts have denied standing to citizens questioning the government on every other clause of late - but they can’t deny it on the Establishment Clause without screwing over all their other pet causes.
The more I read your crap reply, the more you piss me off.
Judge Zatkoff’s legal opinions have been upheld by the USSC many times, especially in Rapanos v US. Judge Zatkoff has been rightfully considered a nominee for supreme court justice.
When the case was filed, Judge Zatkoff found constitutional legal grounds to let the case proceed. But wait, the ultimate legal genuis “JasonC” finds that ‘”liquidationism in finance” trumps the complaint.
Okay...
How about you present “JasonC” opinions before the United States SC. Oh, crap, you can’t because you’ve never stood before the USSC and you’re a blowhard who’s spewing out crap.
You just blew years of personal credibility on FR in a single night. Congratulations.
You are kidding right? Please tell me you're not one of Obomba's minions trying to manipulate people's opinions on the "One's" communist grab of all private industry in this country?
Take your simple-minded Socialistic behind to Europe and LEAVE US ALONE!
This is a Capitalisitic Economy and still a republic. GET LOST!
With that being said, GOD BLESS AMERICA!
Especially given the insurance side of AIG had nothing to do with the bailouts.