From what I’ve read/understood/remembered, in order to end Don’t Ask, Congress has to pass a bill or whatever it would be called.
It can’t be done just by a bunch of idiots wanting to end it.
Of course, it should be ended, going back to “ask and if the answer is wrong show ‘em the door”.
Why would it take a year to plan this? Does everyone have to go through sensitivity training? What a joke.
Just end it. Pass out the rainbow stickers and watch for soldiers holding hands as they stroll around base.
when the “Commander in Chief” is bi-sexual it’s only a matter of time before military policy is forced into line with WH “lifestyle”
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
I promise I will not ping out every single article about this. And sorry for pinging out the article wagglebee had just pinged out.
Looks as though 0bama and the homosexual agenda pushers are really going to try hard with this. It's a two-fer - promote homosexuality *and* weaken the military - two of their main goals!
Gates: Another great idea of G.W. Bush (replacing Rumsfield). Another example of Bush being our version of a two-term Carter.
So help me understand this. If “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is overturned, then it would be “Ask, tell,” right? Methinks it is better to leave things as they are.
I could solve this issue in 10 minutes. Eliminate “Don’t Ask - Don’t Tell” entireley. This is accomplished by denying entry into the military of all homosexuals, period. Then we won’t need “Don’t Ask - Don’t Tell”.
I just pray my old drill sergeant don’t catch wind of this. He had a tendency to get A LITTE MAD when someone said or did something even a little stupid, and well, this thing here is really bleepin’ stupid. I hope by now he got a good heart doc to prescribe him good heart pills and blood pressure meds for just such occasions...
How about: “Touch me and I’ll chop it off.” Works for the straight guys who think the women there are for their amusement too.
Therefore, it also solve's Mullen's "dilemma" to return to a straight-up ban, like we had prior to Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell." Mullen should then have no crisis of his oh-so-sensitive conscience.
DADT is relatively recent, dating to a compromise in Clinton's early years in office when he could not overturn the ban.
Every American should pressure their congress-critters on this and get an out-and-out total agreement to continue DADT or to return to the ban as a must-have before that congress-person ever gets their vote. They must be on record and in writing.
This will nationalize the 2010 election in the same way as gay-marriage initiatives brought them out in droves in the states across the nation.
Will captains of ships (and other field grade officers and/or chaplains), legal officiants in marriage ceremonies, be required to conduct gay marriages? If gays can serve openly, I don't see how a liberal district judge can avoid declaring gay marriage a federal "rights" issue, and therefore, order gay marriages in the military. It is inevitable.
I can’t wait to see the new design for the ‘Fire Island’ class nuclear attack submarine. You have quarters for straight men, straight women, gay men, lesbians, transexuals, and bi-curious. There are no weapons systems, and provisions must be dropped by helo every two days or the crew starves.
We are truly led by the biggest bunch of morons ever. They think its a game.