To: neverdem
Get a shot off fast.
This upsets him long enough to let you make your second shot perfect.
LAZARUS LONG
18 posted on
02/02/2010 11:22:09 PM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
1) First of all, guns back then were highly unaccurate 2)Shooters back then were highly unaccurate. 3)Most of the “really good” gunfighters shot off their load—so to speak—before even landing one. In fact, the best chance a fighter had was to sneak up on an opponent—jesse james, wild bill hickock, one of the Earp brothers—and shoot them in the back.
19 posted on
02/02/2010 11:28:02 PM PST by
gman992
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Might be true in those days, but definitely isn't now. I have seen the pray and spray types all over Iraq and AF, and they never hit anything except by wild luck. The teams are all taught one shot - one kill religiously. Aim at what you are shooting at, and kill it. The pray and sprayers are hoping that you will be upset and unable to aim while they move the bullets in your direction.
Yes, there is a difference between single shot combat and automatic weapons, but I would still rather hit on the first shot.
23 posted on
02/03/2010 6:43:32 AM PST by
wbarmy
(Hard core, extremist, and right-wing is a little too mild for my tastes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson