I love the use of the “Do Not Disturb” sign.
First, this guy was “disturbed”: in fact, something of a psychopath.
Then they came into his room, and again he was (in a different way) disturbed.
And then they leave that sign.
I think that this job was done very neatly, and even very humanely.
If this was Mosaad, they did a good thing. If it was someone else, well maybe they did not have such justifiable motives, but they also did a good thing inadvertently.
How do they know that the intruders photographed all the documents in the briefcase? Why did they not just take the documents? Are they sure that all the documents were photographed, and not just some? What sort of evidence is left behind when a document is photographed? (None, really.)
How do we know that this guy did not just die of a heart-attack? If there is an injection mark, how do they know if it is connected with his heart-attack? Can’t someone put a do-not-disturb sign on his own door, and lie down for a nice rest, and then die?
Who are these suspects with “European passports”? Its a big Europe out there! Where are the suspects? What is the evidence?