Skip to comments.
Obama won't connect terror dots
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^
| February 1, 2010
| THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Posted on 01/31/2010 9:06:23 AM PST by opentalk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
01/31/2010 9:06:23 AM PST
by
opentalk
To: opentalk
You can’t connect the dots when you’re part of the puzzle.
2
posted on
01/31/2010 9:09:49 AM PST
by
shibumi
(Health and well being for S. and L. - in Jesus name we pray!)
I don't think we're supposed to call them "terrorists". Didn't oBama tell us to call them "misguided meanies", or something idiotic like that? I forget.
The only dots that oBama can connect are the sprinkles in his ice cream cone.
3
posted on
01/31/2010 9:11:17 AM PST
by
NoRedTape
To: shibumi
Exactly! Obama is doing all he can to protect his Muslim brothers/terrorists. This is what Obama’s decisions demonstrate. My question is: What are the Democrats gaining from Obama’s treason?
4
posted on
01/31/2010 9:12:36 AM PST
by
abclily
To: opentalk
Interesting observations on the Taliban by that great American philosopher, Jeff Foxworthy.
“YOU MAY BE A TALIBAN IF...”
1. You refine heroin for a living, but you have a moral objection to liquor.
2. You own a $3,000 machine gun and $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can’t afford shoes.
3. You have more wives than teeth.
4. You wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider bacon “unclean.”
5. You think vests come in two styles: bullet-proof and suicide.
6. You can’t think of anyone you haven’t declared Jihad against.
7. You consider television dangerous, but routinely carry explosives in your clothing.
8. You were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs.
9. You have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four.
10. You’ve always had a crush on your neighbor’s goat.
11. Your cousin is president of the United States
5
posted on
01/31/2010 9:12:40 AM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: opentalk
I really don’t think the administration understands yet how badly things are going to go for them if there is another terrorist attack on their watch. The do not understand the problem, and what’s more they seem to insist on remaining deliberately ignorant of it. This is unacceptable in the extreme, and they do not get any more strikes on this.
6
posted on
01/31/2010 9:15:35 AM PST
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: opentalk; Salamander; Slings and Arrows; Markos33; GSP.FAN; mkjessup; All
7
posted on
01/31/2010 9:16:14 AM PST
by
shibumi
(Health and well being for S. and L. - in Jesus name we pray!)
To: Girlene
He can’t connect the dots because Gibbs hid all the crayons.
8
posted on
01/31/2010 9:21:48 AM PST
by
lilycicero
(Hi)
To: abclily
9
posted on
01/31/2010 9:22:54 AM PST
by
shibumi
(Health and well being for S. and L. - in Jesus name we pray!)
To: opentalk
One would not want to connect the dots for action on his allies.
IMHO
10
posted on
01/31/2010 9:23:20 AM PST
by
ripley
To: Bean Counter
I really dont think the administration understands yet how badly things are going to go for them if there is another terrorist attack on their watch. The do not understand the problem, and whats more they seem to insist on remaining deliberately ignorant of it. This is unacceptable in the extreme, and they do not get any more strikes on this.
They got lucky on Christmas Day, but fumbled the opportunity to interrogate the perp by treating him like a 12-y-o shoplifter. Another attack involving mass killing will be predictably met with a LOT of talk, all of it unsatisfying, and serious fantasizing about Islam.
Americans do not take kindly to other Americans being murdered by the hundreds, and the predictably limp response by the current administration will lead to a level of anger and disgust that makes present levels of anger and disgust directed their way seem mild. Continued attempts by the administration to "calm" the "emotional" among us will only worsen things.
I predict lots more vacation time in Hawaii for Obama to get away from rising disgust and frustration from the American people.
11
posted on
01/31/2010 9:28:01 AM PST
by
Nepeta
To: ripley
... and his brothers.... of his “Christian” faith.
Taqiyya and nefarious plans.... nothing but.
All designed for the dhimininishing and marginalization culminating in the collapse of the US of A.
IMO
To: opentalk
13
posted on
01/31/2010 9:36:09 AM PST
by
240B
(he is doing everything he said he would'nt and not doing what he said he would)
To: lilycicero
14
posted on
01/31/2010 11:47:20 AM PST
by
Girlene
(obama has the stink)
To: Bean Counter
“I really dont think the administration understands yet how badly things are going to go for them if there is another terrorist attack on their watch.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I must assume that you mean another attack that kills thousands as there most certainly have been terrorist attacks on Obama’s watch already. That is why they are so insistent on pretending that terrorism is not really terrorism, they DO know that it is not going to help the Democrats any if we have another like 9-11 or worse.
15
posted on
01/31/2010 11:50:43 AM PST
by
RipSawyer
(Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
To: opentalk
Even if he wanted to connect them, he doesn't do what it takes to find them! Hell even when it is in his face he ignores it, connecting dots is above his pay grade apparently.
To: opentalk
Connecting the dots on terrorism is NOT part of Obama's contract with the Saudi's; nor any of the others he is committed to appeasing in the Islamic world.
17
posted on
01/31/2010 6:29:48 PM PST
by
cricket
To: RipSawyer
OTOH. . .what better crisis to take full advantage of; preferably, closer to 2012; but whatever; 'close enough' will do. Imagine, dealing with such an event, the
'Obama Way'.
We can assume nothing of Reason while Obama in 'power'; including what seems almost a coded invite to terrorists; and whether a terrorist should 'rsvp' - or not - think it a luxury of thought to assume an Election, 2012. .
And just as they consistently, do not name the 'terror'; so too, they constantly remind us with every defensive breath; that this is the way BUSH did it!
Oh, say can we see? Surely, we can.
18
posted on
01/31/2010 6:51:09 PM PST
by
cricket
To: Girlene
To: cricket
His actions speak volumes. The Fort Hood incident seems like it was just swept under a rug. With the number of deaths and injuries there should be an outrage into why.
Saudi's buying more of Fox is a move to squash any spotlight on Islam and terrorism.
20
posted on
02/01/2010 8:10:02 AM PST
by
opentalk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson