So, England didn't have a Parliament? In any case, you still didn't answer the question. Is it OK to break the laws of a monarchy (or other non-republican form of government) but not the laws of a Republic? What makes the laws of a Republic more valid than the laws in other forms of government? You seem to assert the position that the law is the law, and breaking the law is never an option.
So let's go with that. Is it ever OK to break the law? If yes, then under what circumstances? If No, then why were the Framers OK in breaking the laws that they were subject to?
The Framers declared the independence from a monarchy to build a representative Republic. If you're advocating open rebellion and insurrection over a child custody case. Have at it, old boy. Let me know how it works out for you.