Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
Precisely what public policy is this ruling contravening? Virginia has a public policy against same-sex unions. It should not be enforcing any policy

Two years ago, the Virginia Supreme Court heard the visitation rights case with these very litigants. The court sided with the plaintiff - the lesbian partner.

On what grounds? Was it on the merits or not?

The judge was following the law. You just don't like the law.

Which law?

90 posted on 01/29/2010 7:57:02 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: freedomwarrior998
Ooops: My post should read:

"Virginia has a public policy against same-sex unions. It should not be enforcing any policy contrary to the laws of the State of Virginia."

92 posted on 01/29/2010 7:58:59 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
What law

Post #35 - I cited the relevant VI statute. That is the statute that the VT judge used to grant visitation to the non-biological parent. The VI Supreme Court upheld that visitation order. That details of that decision may be read here.

95 posted on 01/29/2010 8:05:21 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson