You do recognize that what KSM might or might not do is irrelevant?
Funny, I don't remember the Framers declaring independence from a Republic. I'm pretty sure it was a monarchy. Maybe you have different history books than I do.
So your position is that it is OK to break the laws of a Monarchy, but not those of a Republic? Isn't the law the law? Doesn't one have to work within the system to change it without resorting to breaking the law? Is breaking the law never an option?
The Framers created a system where the people - through this representative system of government - create laws. We, as a civil society, live within the confines of those laws. You're comparing the laws of today with the edicts of a monarch, to what end, apparently only you know. What relevance there is to a child custody case, is a mystery to all but you.