Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand

You have no sense of morals and no sense of justice.

Homosexuality is a sin that destroys nations. Its one of the things that causes depravity in society, and if allowed to flourish it will yield grave consequences.

Taking a child from a biological parent to someone who is not their biological parent, is evil. The mother is a good Christian woman and the ex is a perverted lesbian. Character makes all the difference when giving custody of a child to someone, and its obvious who has better character here.

You say its Lisa’s fault for missed deadlines, and it is true that there are legal consequences to that. But the punishment for missed deadline as implemented by the judge is ridiculously unjust. Turning the case around on her? Ruling in favor of her opponent? Why doesn’t a fine suffice? Answer me that.

Finally, you have said over, and over again that “the law is the law” as if by definition the law is always just. You and I both know that there are bad parts of the law in the US. Why it was just recently that a part of campaign finance reform was destroyed. Was CFR just when it was the law? Abortion is currently completely legal in the USA. Is that a just law?

Not all laws are good. The fact that there are good laws in the US doesn’t mean that bad laws don’t exist.


38 posted on 01/29/2010 12:24:00 PM PST by Jeb21 (www.jewsagainstobama.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Jeb21
"You have no sense of morals and no sense of justice."

That is an insult of the highest order, sir. You are COMPLETELY out of line.

You would have a judge ignore precedent and and the written law to come to a decision that agrees with your particular political point of view. You are a liberal.

43 posted on 01/29/2010 12:32:41 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Jeb21
"But the punishment for missed deadline as implemented by the judge is ridiculously unjust."

This isn't a punishment, it's a ruling. This is a civil lawsuit where both parties are responsible for arguing their position. Ms. Miller ELECTED to not participate in the hearing, effectively ceding her case to the plaintiff giving the court no alternative but to rule in favor of the plaintiff.

I am shocked and dismayed that people who cloak themselves in a veil of conservatism are so shocked when a judge rules THE ONLY WAY HE COULD and still follow the law of the land.

Liberals are the people who want the judiciary to ignore the Constitution, common law and precedent and to reach a decision that they feel is just and correct. Feelings are for liberals, laws are for conservatives.

45 posted on 01/29/2010 12:37:37 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson