The law is wrong. The partner has not seen the child since shortly after she was born. She has no biological connection no financial and no emotional connection. This is a case of an affront to liberty. The law be damned.
Ah, so you want the judiciary to follow the law when you agree with the law, but you want the law ignored when you disagree with the law? Do I need to point out your hypocrisy?
Judges need to follow the law - AT ALL TIMES.
you do understand that she had sought to get ‘child support’ from her ex-lesbian lover !