Posted on 01/28/2010 9:37:13 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
Apropos of my story today about the consistently-ballooning defense budget, Defense News has a leak of the Quadrennial Defense Review, the Pentagon’s big planning document that, among other things, is supposed to shape the budget. This is just a leak of a draft, and not the final document. But the document is entering its absolute final phase, as Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will be testifying about it and next year’s budget (they’re released simultaneously) before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. As I wrote today, Gates sent strong signals last year that the QDR would signal what further big-ticket items would get reined in or cut altogether.
And the draft suggests that Gates wasn’t playing around. Some bullet points:
The FY11 budget build on FY10, providing additional attention to key lines of investment that are highlighted in the reports
■ Taking care of our troops and our people
■ Reforming how we buy and operate
Rebalancing for:
■ The current fight
■ Plausible future challenges
Now, you can’t tell from that what will be cut. The defense budget is always a fight between the immediate challenges of the present and what each military service envisions as the future of war and its relevance to it. Gates has said, repeatedly — and conspicuously last year when he chopped a bunch of programs — that he’s sick of buying stuff for every conceivable challenge, no matter how hypothetical. But we need to wait and see how that cashes out. The draft’s intro says:
QDR analyses centered on the following challenge areas: defending the United States and providing defense support to civil authorities, conducting irregular operations (including counterinsurgency, stability operations, and counter-terrorist operations), defeating adversaries armed with anti-access capabilities, countering weapons of mass destruction, and operating effectively in cyberspace.
That paragraph strongly suggests — as does Gates’ entire tenure, really — that the Pentagon ought to be reoriented around immediate, manifested challenges. (I guess you could argue that the “anti-access capabilities” thing is the exception; my ignorant speculation is that’s in there so the South Koreans and Japanese don’t think we’re ignoring North Korea.) But here’s the thing: the services are really good at arguing that their existing priorities are applicable to new circumstances. That’s how the F-22, a Cold War-era fighter aircraft, survived until Gates killed it last year. So we’ll have to see how exactly the budget measures up to the QDR construct. Does it rebrand old wine or does it smash some corked bottles?
Luckily, Michele Flournoy, the undersecretary of defense for policy, will give a speech on Tuesday, before Gates and Mullen testify, on the QDR.
THis document is way way late. It should have been out in time to shape the budget, along with the 30-year air plan and 30-year ship plan.
But Obama’s administraiton is incompetent, and hopelessly behind, which means they are doing budgets without having a purpose and plan. It’s ludicrous.
The Greening of the Pentagon's Master Strategy Review Wired News - Nathan Hodge - Jan 27, 2010 Climate change may be an “accelerant of instability” in future conflicts, and the US military needs to plan for possible environmental ...
Pentagon Master Plan: Super-Size My Drone Fleet Wired News - Nathan Hodge - 9 hours ago The US military already has plans in the works to grow its fleet of Predators and Reapers, the long-loitering, armed surveillance drones ...
3 more interesting articles, that cannot be posted due to copyright complaint.
That's code for China, not North Korea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.