[marron]

Glad those days are over. Now we just get them lawyers.

[Amagi]

Begs the question: Was he lying then or is he lying now?

[Mr. K]

someone has a book to sell

There was NO WAY the liberal elite publichers would print a bokk saying saying the CIA was right..

The only way he gets published is if he is willing to say the opposite.

And from what i read above all he is saying is that he HEARD abut this instead of being there witniessing it. It still could be tru- but the headline leads you believe he was lying

[chainsaw]

The democrats used any and every lie to discredit president Bush. As did the drive by media.

[Red Steel]

So Steve, how’s your disinformation campaign going on FR?

Quite a misleading headline you found here. It’s going to be a bad November for you when your party loses it shirt and Congress.

[Liberty Valance]

LOL - Can’t wait for that KSM trial near ground zero. Water cooler talk sez even Valerie Plame is prepping to testify. Turns out that yellow cake recipe actually called for 3 eggs instead of just two.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

He must have been waterboarded.

[Deb]

Hahaha! Hey, if its in Foreign Policy magazine, published by the Washington Post, its flippin' GOLD. But then, the guy doesn't say it didn't happen, he said he heard from the guys who did it.

Never mind, it wouldn't be a steve-b thread unless it misrepresented or lied.

[iopscusa]

Yo s-b, you seem to have missed a bit of the story. Take a lesson from FloppingAces: ‘Left Gleeful Over Absurd Article Claiming Waterboarding Didn’t Work’...“CIA Man Retracts Claim on Waterboarding” Yup, thats the headline the lefties are jumping all over today from Foreign Policy. The article purports:
Well, it’s official now: John Kiriakou, the former CIA operative who affirmed claims that waterboarding quickly unloosed the tongues of hard-core terrorists, says he didn’t know what he was talking about.
Of course there is more than meets the eye on this story. The fact of the matter is that Kiriakou says he “didn’t know what he was talking about” because he wasn’t in the room when the waterboarding took place. The whole piece uses over 900 words to assert that the success of waterboarding is in question because Kiriakou used second hand information to come to the conclusion that waterboarding doesn’t work, but completely ignores the fact that the interrogators themselves confirmed KSM broke because of waterboarding and the declassified documents prove that attacks were prevented because of the information that was extracted.