Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Compared to the MSM, the Nat. Enquirer is solid journalism.
1 posted on 01/21/2010 12:10:54 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pissant
National Enquirer submitting John Edwards coverage for Pulitzers”

No can do.
Wrong Party.
Now if it were a story about a Republican presidential candidate, that would be another matter altogether.

2 posted on 01/21/2010 12:14:02 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Hey, they tell the truth more often than the MSM. Shoosh, didn’t bammy get a Nobel, whats stopping the National Enquirer getting a Pulitzer. Did the NYT ever return the Pulitzer they won for shilling for Stalin? At least the WaPo recognized their Pulitzer was won on deceit. Just sayin.


4 posted on 01/21/2010 12:25:08 PM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

John Edwards is one dead horse I don’t mind being beaten. What a total scumbag, and it turns out his wife was no saint, either. She knew what a POS he was all along.


5 posted on 01/21/2010 12:25:11 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

More power to them. At least they do investigative journalism.


6 posted on 01/21/2010 12:31:14 PM PST by Persevero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
“Don't laugh”

Why would we laugh? They should win it. When the LA Times editor puts out a memo even to their bloggers to kill the story, the new newspaper of record was the National Enquirer.

They rate the prize for this story.

7 posted on 01/21/2010 12:34:29 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

They should win it and they deserve it.

Pulitzer winner National Enquirer. Nice sound to it.

Would love to be a fly on the wall in Arthur Sulzberger’s office when it is announced!


8 posted on 01/21/2010 12:52:32 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

don’t laugh.

Why would we laugh. The National Enquirer broke the story, and the rest of the media ignored the information, on purpose at that!


9 posted on 01/21/2010 1:15:56 PM PST by Freddd (CNN is not credible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Don’t they use the same judges as the Nobel Peace Prize?


11 posted on 01/21/2010 1:17:34 PM PST by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

AMEN!! They DESERVE it!!! They are ACTUAL REPORTERS....unlike the Enemedia that are nothing but STENOS.


13 posted on 01/21/2010 2:05:51 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Just the act of the Enquirer submitting the story to the Pulitzer committee for consideration would be a huge embarrassment for the dominant media. I would love to see the Enquirer follow through.


16 posted on 01/21/2010 2:27:49 PM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson