[Pecos]

...but of course, MSNBC and CNN do not have a particular point of view.....

[yooling]

They just don’t get it. Do they? Simply amazing.

[alice_in_bubbaland]

That’s OK, I have a dim view of this WH.

[PLD]

The goons in the white house should be very afraid of the FOX viewers since we the people will get their filthy butt out of our house..Scott Brown is just the beginning you fools..

I want to tank ever person in Mass that voted for Scott Brown they made history last night and took their state back from the criminal fools that ran it.

[TexasFreeper2009]

It's a good thing we got some objective news to turn to on MSNBC Olberman is very good at not being seen as partisan...
/s

[Westbrook]

Isn’t Pfeiffer the husband of Anita Dunn?

Demon-cRATs are nothing if they are not inbred.

It probably explains a lot of their loose grasp on cognitive reality.

[Da Coyote]

The WH? Isn’t that where we’re sending our elementary school dropouts?

[newheart]

I could care less if a news organization has a point of view. It is inevitable. There is no such thing as ‘objective’ reporting. Reporters are human beings and human beings have points of view that inform, even if subconsciously, their perspective. So what.

Fox comes closest by at least being willing to provide a forum for opposing views, even on the opinion shows. But the idea that the rest of the networks are unbiased is simply a lie. The myth of objective journalism died with William Randolph Hearst. And good riddance.

If journalists would simply show some courage (as if) and make their political affinities public then viewers can take that into account when listening to them. I don’t care. I am an adult and it is my responsibility to try and sort out the information that comes to me.

It is time for journalism to drop the pretense. And that includes Fox.

[Exit148]

Oh? That verbal run from Olbermann was not a point of view?

[Wee-Weed Up]

Yet Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, and Rachel Maddow don’t have a point of view? Oh, that’s right, they don’t have a point of view because it’s the same point of view the White house has. I get it now.

[ClearCase_guy]

I see this as excellent news.

The Democrats are severely out of touch, deeply in denial, and have no clue that people are tired of them.

[rod1]

Is this Anita “I have an enemy’s list” Dunn?

[Young Werther]

I see that the White House guys have put on their TRANSPARENCY glasses.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Fox News responded tonight: “Obviously new to his position, Dan seems to be intent upon repeating the mistakes of his predecessor... and we all remember how well that turned out.”

Ayup!

[Star Traveler]

"We don't feel an obligation to treat them like we would treat a CNN or an ABC or an NBC or a traditional news organization. But there are times when it would make sense to communicate with them and appear on the network."

Fox News responded tonight: "Obviously new to his position, Dan seems to be intent upon repeating the mistakes of his predecessor... and we all remember how well that turned out."

LOL.... Go Fox News! ...

[FatherFig1o155]

Fox News responded tonight: "Obviously new to his position, Dan seems to be intent upon repeating the mistakes of his predecessor... and we all remember how well that turned out."

Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark!

[Seaplaner]

"We don't feel an obligation to treat them like we would treat a CNN or an ABC or an NBC or a traditional news organization.

Said Mister Pheiffer, as he hits at a hornet's nest with a stick.

.

[loveliberty2]

"I have the same view of Fox that Anita [Dunn] had, which is that Fox is not a traditional news organization. They have a point of view. That point of view pervades the entire network both the opinion shows, like Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly, but also through the newscasts during the day," Pfeiffer said."

How misleading! For decades, ABC, CBS, CNN, and NBC have had "points of view" which tilted their news and features to the Democrats. More recently, their "points of view" went all the way to the Far Left in blatant ways.

And Pfeiffer dares object to an organization which, in his mind, has a "point of view"?

This White House continues to "misunderestimate" the intelligence of the American public in an age of instant communications! How arrogant and condescending!

[paulycy]

"Fox is not a traditional news organization and we believe that change is bad."

[ohiogrammy]

Tried to watch a bit of MSNBC last night, they are totally a Dem network. How dare they criticize a station that actually uses Juan Williams, Bob Beckel, Calmes, etc.?