Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coakley Supports Partial-birth Abortion, Taxes for Abortion, Opposes Parent Consent Laws on Abortion
Associated Content (AC) ^ | January 18, 2010 | Marc Schenker

Posted on 01/18/2010 3:03:41 AM PST by Suvroc10

Martha Coakley, the Democrat candidate for Massachusetts' vacant senate seat, supports partial-birth abortion, using taxpayer money for abortion, and even opposes parent consent laws on abortion. This, at least, according to the group Mass Citizens for Life who've been hard at work this past Sunday in distributing fliers to churches all across Massachusetts, warning Catholics of Coakley's disreputable, anti-life stand on partial-birth abortion, the use of taxpayer money for abortion, and shocking opposition to parental consent laws.

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; antilife; democrat; ma2010; marthacoakley

1 posted on 01/18/2010 3:03:42 AM PST by Suvroc10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Coakley’s campaign blundered a few days ago by accusing Scott Browm of not wanting to treat rape victims.

Brown needs to counter that Coakley happily supports sticking a pair of scissors into the heads of babies as a means of birth control.


2 posted on 01/18/2010 3:27:09 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Just when I thought this woman could not be more vile....


3 posted on 01/18/2010 3:30:14 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt (Ronald Reagan: If we ever forget that we're one nation under God,then we'll be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

Coakley looks like she’d be vulnerable if she decided to run for reelection as Massachusettes (sic) Attorney General.


4 posted on 01/18/2010 3:35:31 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

I think Coakley achieves a state of orgasm every time a baby is murdered in the womb, that’s what I think.

And the goofball son of the late ‘liberal lion’ Fat Teddy (referring to Patrick here) didn’t even know Coakley’s first name, kept calling her ‘Marcia’ instead of ‘Martha’, that’s gotta hurt.


5 posted on 01/18/2010 4:03:12 AM PST by mkjessup (If you admire, support and make excuses for RINOs (like John McCain) that makes YOU a RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10
It seems that Croakley supports all the bad things about having government run everything that she appears to not be the man for the job.

Why is it that in very few instances a woman legislator is much, much worse than a man would be and in 99% of the cases is butt ugly to boot?

Goodbye, Croakley, hello, Brown!

6 posted on 01/18/2010 4:26:40 AM PST by IbJensen (A Prayer for Obama (Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

BROWN RESPONDS TO OBAMA ON THE TRUCK!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2430893/posts?page=42
[Zero got B-Slapped.]

Brown Threatens Legal Action
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2430542/posts
“Brown wants to send 1,736 rape victims away from the hospital.”

What The Heck (Obumbler Attacks Trucks Drivers Alert)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2430706/posts
“ ... hit Scott Brown for driving a truck at least three times ... “

Question (Obama: “I Don’t Know Brown’s Policies.” DUHOH ALERT)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2430701/posts
“So what exactly made him qualified to attack Brown’s policies?” — NRO

Barney Frank bashes Coakley. “She let it become a personality contest and that was a mistake”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2430656/posts

More added to response to this post, such as the outrageous injustices she perpetrated for political gain, Obama heckled at rally, Coakley gaffes, Barney Frank bashing her, and Patrick Kennedy doesn’t even know Coakley’s Name.


7 posted on 01/18/2010 4:48:37 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (2010 HOUSE RACES! Help everyone get the goods on their House Rats. See my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Dem Congressman predicts ‘very slow count’...
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2010/01/if-coakley-loses-fast-forward.html

Coakley’s Top Ten
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2431029/posts

Obama heckled at rally...
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/01/17/obama_heckled_at_coakley_rally.html

Patrick Kennedy, son of late Sen. Edward Kennedy, mentioned Coakley repeatedly during his remarks to reporters, each time referring to her as ‘Marcia,’ not ‘Martha’...
http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/01/after_obama_ral.php

Barney Frank: “[Coakley/Mass.] let it become a personality contest and that was a mistake”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2430656/posts
[With friends like this ...]

Coakley Supports Partial-birth Abortion, Taxes for Abortion, Opposes Parent Consent Laws on Abortion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2431034/posts
[Like I’ve been saying — her overall sense of justice helps validate that infanticidal death trolls are inhuman in other issues too.]

Only 36% of Likely Mass. Voters Support Obamacare; Only 48% Approve of Job Obama’s Doing
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2431015/posts

Coakley’s Support of “Transgender Rights” Would Force Taxpayers to Fund Murderer’s Trans Procedures
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2430006/posts

” ... he raped a 23-month-old girl with a hot, curling iron ...” But Coakley released him because his “ ... union-representative father steered lots of endorsements and donations to the Coakley for AG campaign ... “
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2429753/posts

Martha Coakley’s Convictions [role played in a notorious sex case raises questions]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429453/posts

One of Martha Coakley`s victims
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429811/posts
[Louise Woodward, the English Nanny convicted in part by Martha Coakley]

[Coakley’s Witch Hunt of Innocents for Political Gain]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429746/posts
How to Extort a Confession [Gerald Amirault] From April 22, 2002

[NY Slimes?] From Bay State to Red State? [Coakley’s gaffes]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429806/posts

Clinton fights for Martha, rails against ‘Tea Party’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429452/posts

Democrats Accuse Brown of ‘Radical’ Ties as Senate Election Nears [Tea Party Tie-in]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429627/posts

Analysis: Senate race underscores voter anger
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429745/posts
Breitbart (AP)

DEM THREAT: SENATE CAN PASS HEALTHCARE WITH 51 VOTES
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aPg2UfFaCh9c&pos=9

Martha Coakley Continues Her Blunders, Gaffes, Stumbles and Flubs
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2429850/posts

I’ve been called a LOT of things…(Curt Schilling)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2429810/posts
[Coakley steps in it again.]


8 posted on 01/18/2010 4:50:32 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (2010 HOUSE RACES! Help everyone get the goods on their House Rats. See my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10
Wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles! I just got off the phone with my 88 year-old father; a died in the wool, life-long democrat who was born in and has lived in Mass for over 70 years. HE HAS NEVER VOTED FOR A REPUBLICAN… NEVER. After polite chit chat about the NFL play off games I dared broach the subject and asked him if he was going to vote on Tuesday (every time “politics” have come up in the past he has berated me with tirades about those “evil republicans”). Well, he came right out and told me… “I AM going to vote on Tuesday and I am seriously thinking of voting for Scott Brown.” Needless to say I was and am totally ASTONISHED… ASTONISHED (I did not let him know in the least and kept my heart-felt joy and enthusiasm at his answer to my self so as to not “scare him off”)!

I tactfully asked him WHY he was going to vote for Brown and his answer was: “Because of the healthcare bill Obama is trying to pass.” I carefully agreed with him and reinforced the fact that Obama wants to gut Medicare/Medicaid by taking away 500 BILLION DOLLARS from the system and that if he adds 40 million people to the rolls, especially illegal aliens the health care system would collapse… I told him that Brown is an honorable man and that he is totally opposed to the “healthcare” bill and would vote against it… MY DAD AGREED! I was flabbergasted!

If my own father; a life-long Massachusetts FDR Democrat who has voted for EVERY Kennedy, Kerry/democrat to ever come down the pike, is going to vote for Scott Brown, a REPUBLICAN, BECAUSE OF HIS OPPOSITION TO Obama and his evil healthcare debacle then things are looking VERY promising for Scott Brown and we could all be in for an incredible victory on Tuesday. To this end I am fervently praying.

9 posted on 01/18/2010 6:35:03 AM PST by Jmouse007 (God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, deliver us from evil, in Jesus name, amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10
Here is Scott Brown's position on abortion:

Abortion
While this decision should ultimately be made by the woman in consultation with her doctor, I believe we need to reduce the number of abortions in America. I believe government has the responsibility to regulate in this area and I support parental consent and notification requirements and I oppose partial birth abortion. I also believe there are people of good will on both sides of the issue and we ought to work together to support and promote adoption as an alternative to abortion.

Now - I would vote for Brown over Coakley in a nano-second.

But to Freepers who demand an aggressive, no compromise pro life position from the GOP (I'm thinking of you Palinbots here) - are you ready to walk away from Brown because he is not pure on the life issue??

10 posted on 01/18/2010 6:36:01 AM PST by Notary Sojac ("Goldman Sachs" is to "US economy" as "lamprey" is to "lake trout")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
I'm thinking of you Palinbots here

Well, you know, I initially crafted a well though out response, but kept going back to the above statement.

I've decided not to stoop to your level by posting it.

11 posted on 01/18/2010 7:11:32 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Suvroc10

A 2 year old isn’t even a person to her so what is a younger baby?

This thing should not ever see any seat of power ever again. This thing is nothing short of a mortal fiend.


12 posted on 01/18/2010 8:20:57 AM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

It mostly likely does. It also tried its hardest to release a man convicted of raping a two year with a hot iron on no bail. This thing is absolute corruption.


13 posted on 01/18/2010 8:26:52 AM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
But to Freepers who demand an aggressive, no compromise pro life position from the GOP (I'm thinking of you Palinbots here) - are you ready to walk away from Brown because he is not pure on the life issue??

Based on what Scott Brown has said regarding abortion (that the number of abortions should be reduced, he is against partial birth abortion, he is for parental notification), my perception is that he is in fact, pro-life and while his positions may not be 100 percent aligned with what we would wish, I believe that he is a thinking conservative, and his own views are certainly subject to being changed.
14 posted on 01/18/2010 11:08:16 AM PST by mkjessup (0bama squats to pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun
There are a lot of Freepers who seem to think that we should just anoint Palin as the nominee right now, and not bother with all that tiresome old primary campaign stuff.

Many of them apparently feel that way because in their view, anyone else who could win the GOP nomination is a pro-abort RINO.

And any Freeper who disagrees with the prospective anointing is generally tagged as a "bot" in support of someone else. So, I figure what's good for the gander is good for the goose.

It was not intended as a personal insult to you, I'm sorry if you took it that way, but I'm not going to take back the post.

15 posted on 01/18/2010 11:56:46 AM PST by Notary Sojac ("Goldman Sachs" is to "US economy" as "lamprey" is to "lake trout")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson