Posted on 01/17/2010 10:27:33 AM PST by rabscuttle385
Are you saying that McCain, Graham, Crist, Kirk, and the other RINOs are not leftists?
For example today you claim Palin is campaign for McCain, which if you had read your article you would see is an intellectually dishonest fraudulent claim. HE said she would. She has said nothing about it.
Yesterday you were claiming Scott Brown supports Abortion and Cap and Tax. Another example of you posting out right lies to attack someone on the right.
Prior to that your were pushing an absurd lie that Bush was worse then Obama on the Federal Deficit.
Then prior to that you were trash talking Bush for Tarp while ignoring the fact Obama took the repaid TARP money and spent it in Dec on his new “jobs program”.
So, why is it you only attack those on right, never ever find anyone on the Left to be upset with?
“She has made plain in her book and elsewhere where she disagrees with McCain, mostly global warming.”
that is the only disagreement?
McCain wins big at Maricopa County GOP annual conclave
January 16, 2010
…as least acceptable candidate for U.S. Senate seat from Arizona.
Out of 228 ballots cast at the January 16, 2010 mandatory meeting of elected precinct committeemen, the results of the unofficial straw poll for the U.S. Senate seat were as follows:
Least Acceptable Candidate for U.S. Senate:
Sen. John McCain: 183 votes — 82.4%
Former Congressman J.D. Hayworth: 13 votes — 5.9%
First Choice for U.S. Senate:
Former Congressman J.D. Hayworth: 156 votes — 68.7%
Sen. John McCain: 24 votes — 10.6%
Jim Deakin: 35 votes — 15.4%
Chris Simcox: 12 votes — 5.3%
The conservative slate for members-at-large won overwhelmingly, besting the McCain cohorts.
(Scroll down for the 11 by-law changes, 11 resolutions.)
See the entire vote for U.S. Senate, Arizona Governor, Attorney General, and survey questions concerning the roles of the party elected officials and Arizona’s grassroots party workers, the precinct committeemen.
In the vote for governor, it would appear there is a disconnect between Gov. Jan Brewer and the party loyalists on the issue of taxation as part of the solution for Arizona’s budget crisis. However, she was given a warm welcome and her speech — which did not mention taxes – was well-received.
Brewer was forthright in laying blame for much of the economic calamity at the feet of former Gov. Janet Napolitano, saying she and her team conducted business for the state of Arizona exactly the same as she’s handling Homeland Security. Brewer reiterated her commitment to halting illegal immigration, spoke of her Second Amendment credentials and reminded the crowd of the pro-life legislation she signed.
In total, there were 1699 elected precinct committeemen represented at the Saturday meeting – 1163 in person and 536 by proxy.
From Seeing Red Az. http://seeingredaz.wordpress.com/
**I still don’t think that JD will run and there is a lot of Arizonans who are mad at John (include myself), I think that the vote this weekend was meant to be a warning for John to RIGHT the sinking ship. IMHO
His choosing her put her on the national stage. She isn’t likely to forget that nor should she. The woman is fairly gracious from what I can see.
Really?
Where did I say anything intellectually dishonest or fraudulent?
The original title as posted, plus the parenthetical addition, is gramatically correct.
Now, go back and read post 24, and pick up a middle school or junior high school grammar textbook and read it, cover to cover.
If you cannot stand the heat, don't dish the fire.
Pathetic and childish is the kindest thing that can be said about you Palin haters habit of spewing ignorant venom at everyone supporting Palin, then whining hysterically when they return your own rhetorical posting style at you.
Who’s resorting to “juvenile personal attacks”?
You refer to us as:
“gutter slime”
“pathetic”
“spewing ignorant venom”
“whining hysterically”
“ignorant”
“arrogant”
“elitist”
“twits”
“snobs”
Look in the mirror. You’re out of control. Good day.
She is forgiving.
Between "I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him." and now McCain saying that he is "sure" that she will campaign for him in Arizona, presumably starting in the primary election, it isn't exactly a "juvenile personal attack" to point out that she managed to get herself into a no-win situation.
Those are her words and McCain's words, not mine.
Now, either she backs McCain and alienates conservatives, except for those who do believe she can do no wrong (as Falcon28 pointed out earlier), or she refuses and alienates the GOP leadership, potentially jeopardizing any future plans of hers for running for national political office.
If you can't comprehend that, or you don't want (whether out of fear, ignorance, or blind adoration on your part) to face the music, then perhaps it is you--and maybe a certain number of her other supporters--who are putting her on a pedestal and holding her to a different--and looser--set of standards than other public figures in the national political scene.
As for Ms. Palin, if she elects to campaign for McCain in the Arizona primary election (thus either scaring off J.D. Hayworth or assisting McCain in defeating J.D. Hayworth), then Ms. Palin should be partially credited with all of McCain's treachery following his re-election.
McCain is putting major pressure on Sarah to come here and help him. We shall see if she buckles.
Joe Arpaio is 100% behind J.D. Hayworth.
And that’s a good thing!
Yes, but they are ‘Republican leftists’ so that is OK. Whose side are you on Rab's?? If you challenge the Republican leftists then you are defending the Democrat leftists, according to MNJ.
There is only one principle that counts, it's called “republicans must win”. Maybe Steele can get Obama to join the republican party to get AAs to vote republican...
The article does not say that
"...suggesting that he may even invite her to Arizona to help him campaign for re-election to a fifth term...."
".."And she'll be coming to Arizona, I'm sure," he said..."
"He may invite" and "she'll be coming to Arizona, I'm sure" is speculation on his part, nothing more.
It is. And by the way, I have NEVER seen you attack anyone on the right.
(unless some moron considers George W. on the right ;-)
I'll believe that when I see it.
I seriously doubt that her national support will dip if she maintains staunch loyalty to Senator John McCain who certainly launched her national career. JMO
Glenn Beck was on FNC BoR (the Factor) last week and said that Palin cannot currently be president based on her performance on his show interview last week. He said she was completely on the defensive and seemed hesitant to answer questions (except those about democrats) because she might slip up. They also pointed out her response to the nation's founders question didn't go well. You can tell that Beck had to do most of the talking, throwing her softballs to try to get her to open up.
So far I only posted the part of the interview where she was asked about Republicans and McCain. She had a great chance to talk about how republicans need to change but didn't. Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin on John McCain and Republicans
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.