Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wuli
Good question. Another point to make is that IVF doesn't actually "cure" infertility: which is to say, people who were incapable of reproducing normally via sexual intercourse, remain incapable: the underlying cause is not addressed.

A true, morally unobjectionable therapy would identify and modify the underlying cause in order to restore sexual reproductive health and natural fertility--- not try to replace it with a laboratory process.

So strange that nowadays "sexual health" is used as a euphemism for a program of deliberately, temporarily or permanently, subverting normal sexual relationships and procreative processes.

20 posted on 01/13/2010 6:54:16 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("God bless the child who's got his own." Arthur Herzog Jr./Billie Holiday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Would you treat a child born through an IVF treatment, any differently than one conceived naturally? If not, then hasn’t the procedure helped the parents achieve what they initially sought, overcoming a natural obstacle?


22 posted on 01/13/2010 10:30:19 AM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson