A true, morally unobjectionable therapy would identify and modify the underlying cause in order to restore sexual reproductive health and natural fertility--- not try to replace it with a laboratory process.
So strange that nowadays "sexual health" is used as a euphemism for a program of deliberately, temporarily or permanently, subverting normal sexual relationships and procreative processes.
Would you treat a child born through an IVF treatment, any differently than one conceived naturally? If not, then hasn’t the procedure helped the parents achieve what they initially sought, overcoming a natural obstacle?