Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ExxonMobil May Strike Deal for $1B Arctic Rig
Rig Zone ^ | January 08, 2010 | Rigzone Staff

Posted on 01/09/2010 7:10:58 AM PST by thackney

Exxon Mobil Corp. is reportedly mulling over a deal with leading offshore rig contractor Transocean to construct a drilling rig capable of operating in extreme Arctic conditions for as much as $1 billion, according to Reuters.

Citing a person familiar with the matter, Reuters reported Friday that ExxonMobil may deploy the rig offshore Greenland, Iceland or Alaska at a dayrate close to record-level contracts in the $650,000 range, such as those signed for ultra-deepwater rigs by Seadrill and Transocean near the peak of the market in 2008.

In November, Transocean Chief Executive Bob Long stated that the company expected to unveil a new Arctic-class newbuild rig order, along with a contract, by the close of the year.

Chief Operating Officer Steven Newman, who will take the helm as Transocean's next chief executive in the first quarter of 2010, also commented during a recent conference call: "We have progressed [the rig's] design fairly far along [and] are in very developed discussions with a customer." Newman was hopeful that the contract would be finalized by the end of 2009, although Transocean had confirmed neither the contract nor the customer as 2009 drew to a close.

Only speculations pointing to ExxonMobil as the operator behind the contract have emerged out of major media outlets.

With plenty of oil majors still betting on deepwater drilling so long as higher oil prices justify the means, the largely untapped Arctic is becoming an attractive offshore drilling frontier with untold riches buried beneath its volatile surface.

Despite recently making a $30-billion acquisition of XTO Energy to tap its unconventional resources on land, ExxonMobil, the world's largest publicly traded international oil and gas company, is still comfortable opening its wallet to explore in high-risk offshore terrain. According to the oil heavyweight's website, the Company retains "a portfolio of significant Arctic opportunities, with ongoing studies spanning the range of exploration, project feasibility assessment and planning, and technology development."

Both companies declined to comment on the potential transaction when contacted by Reuters on Thursday.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; oil

1 posted on 01/09/2010 7:10:59 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney
I Smell Jobs....created by Corporate America.

Hey, Obozo, you watching, listening, comprehending ?

2 posted on 01/09/2010 7:23:20 AM PST by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed
Hey, Obozo, you watching, listening, comprehending ?

Shhhh!

Keep it under your hat for if Obozo gets wind of it he will do everything in his power to stifle them!

3 posted on 01/09/2010 7:26:01 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I Smell Jobs....created by Corporate America.

Hey, Obozo, you watching, listening, comprehending ?

4 posted on 01/09/2010 7:26:54 AM PST by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Extreme Arctic Conditions? What extreme arctic conditions? I thought it was quite balmy up there now. The ice is about gone and it's too warm for polar bears. That should be perfect conditions for oil drilling in bermuda shorts and tee shirts.

Wait a minute ... do you mean Al Gore lied to us about that?

5 posted on 01/09/2010 7:59:00 AM PST by Freedom_Isn't_Free (in fact, it isn't even cheap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Isn't_Free

Now follow the logic here. Exxon spends $1 Billion for an arctic drilling rig which will pump out oil which, when burned, produces a lot of CO2 which, in turn is going to warm the arctic, thus forcing Congress to tax us about $1,000 Billion as penance for Exxon spending the $1 Billion in the first place.

So, in conclusion, wouldn’t we all be much better off if Exxon abandoned their plans and stopped looking for oil?


6 posted on 01/09/2010 8:02:21 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

And he will by taxing it to death.


7 posted on 01/09/2010 8:35:21 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney
This is excellent....and I understand that there is only one problem yet to be solved...then they can proceed.

China must agree to lending the funds needed to Exonn.

Once that's done...it's a go.

8 posted on 01/09/2010 8:37:52 AM PST by Logic n' Reason (Keep your friends close......keep your enemies closer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed
Hey, Obozo, you watching, listening, comprehending ?

Yes, and probably plotting ways to stop it. Lots of environmental considerations and red tape to throw in the way.

9 posted on 01/09/2010 7:02:27 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson