Posted on 01/09/2010 2:38:20 AM PST by Scanian
On Christmas day, a terrorist known to our intelligence system tried to blow up 300 innocents on a US-bound flight. Our government's response is to take porno pictures of your wife and daughter.
A radical-Islamist US Army major, known to our intelligence system, massacred his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood. Our government's response was to offer counseling sessions.
A triple agent, known to our intelligence system, detonated a suicide bomb at a CIA outpost, killing seven Americans and a cousin of Jordan's king. Our government's response is to shift intelligence assets away from targeting terrorists to support development efforts.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
That was probably one of the strangest aspects of the whole thing. They all seemed so indifferent. Oh, ho-hum. Don't be silly, you sheep; we have to sacrifice some of you every now and then in the interests of diversity. But that's ok, because Bambi has his own ride and he's certainly not at risk. He's supposedly even got a prayer rug installed in AF1...so he's diverse enough as it is.
I think the point that the bureaucracy is too fat to respond is a good one, but the impression I got from the comments that have come out about both the Christmas Day attempt and the Fort Hood shooting is that the bureaucrats were nervous. They all knew they had identified a potentially dangerous person, but they passed him on to another layer of bureaucracy because nobody wanted to be the one to make the politically incorrect decision that this "diverse" person was a terrorist threat to America. After all, under the new diverse management, there's no such thing as terrorists and not really any such thing as America anymore.
So I think, while Peters is correct in saying that procedures could be tightened up and made more direct, the problem lies more in attitude and overall policy than anything else. And I don't see that changing.
You are absolutely correct.
The Marxist ideologues in control of our government institutions view the free enterprise system (often incorrectly referred to as capitalism, a term coined by Karl Marx) as being a crime against all humanity. And, unlike Obama's attempts at double-talk and deceit about "the system" failed, as if it were devoid of incompetent people, they see conservative Christian white people as the real problem.
Remember, Bill Ayers, one of Obama's mentors, has said that he expects it will require the deaths of 125 million US citizens to install a socialist government in the United States. The deaths of 300 people is just a drop in the bucket on the way to accomplishing their goals.
Yes, agreed. And I wonder how many American deaths will be necessary to install Islam here?
I think this is a double-barreled attack on the US. We have the Marxist barrel and the Muslim barrel.
Political correctness is working as planned. It is paralyzing our forces, domestic and military, when action is needed. The military's ROE are ridiculous and are just battlefield political correctness. They forestall actions when action is needed.
Our intel system is vast, redundant, intractable, self-satisfied, cautious and slower than crosstown traffic during a presidential motorcade.
The reason the knee-jerk reaction by Democrats to add more bureaucracy and money to any situation is because the more government employees there are the slower things move and the more money the Democrats get from the increased size of the employees union. It takes fewer people to control a vast bureau than it does to control many creative people.
The planned downfall of our republic and free enterprise system has been under way since the Woodrow Wilson administration and has increased with incremental effectiveness with each Democrat administration since. This administration intends to complete the job.
For some time I thought that I was the only one that could see what was happening. With posts like yours, I feel confident that the people who come to Free Republic are well informed about the connections between American Marxist (commonly referred to as Democrats) and the world-wide Marxist/Communist revolution.
If you haven't done so, you may want to read an old book titled Fabian Freeway, the High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A. by Rose L. Martin. It's a difficult read and probably out of print for years, but it documents the collaboration between the Fabian Socialist and the America's Democrats starting with Wilson, through Roosevelt and ending with the Johnson administration.
Be of good cheer.
Another good research exercise is to look up Communist Goals, The Frankfurt School and Saul Allinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.
Communist Goals is a KGB document, or a compilation of KGB information, from the late forties or early fifties. The most often found list is one read on the floor of the house of Representatives in 1963 with 40 something goals. It lays out in clear language what their intentions are. Discouragingly, most of them have already been achieved.
The activities of The Frankfurt School show exactly how they intend to do it in the long run and Allinsky describes the street tactics.
There is also another good book, “The New Dealers’ War: the war within WWII” by Thomas Fleming. He makes and documents an excellent argument that we entered and fought WWII in a way to ensure the survival of Joseph Stalin and the USSR. His agreements with Stalin before his (FDR’s) death assured the Soviet domination of Eastern Europe.
Naturally, all this readily available information is hidden from us by the Democrats with the collaboration of the old media and academia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.