Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

Oh, that’s right. So that covers, what, 2007-2008? I hope he was doing something awfully important prior to that that he refused to run against Dorgan in 2004 (or against Conrad in 2000 for that matter).


21 posted on 01/11/2010 3:07:54 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican

Might be personal reasons why he didn’t run. He was apparently doing several things from the 2000-07 period, briefly serving at one point as an aide to the Secretary of the Army. Of course, I also noticed he’ll be 66 in 2012, so it’s possible he may again decline to run, not wanting to spend his retirement years in DC. He really should’ve run in either 2000 or 2004.


22 posted on 01/11/2010 3:22:38 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson