[CharlesWayneCT]

I have seen no real evidence that there was molestation. I read an article where the mother said the daughter had taken a bath with the woman. The Virginia CPS evaluated the claims of abuse and found no evidence.

If there is other reports than the statements of the mother in interviews, I’d be interested. But outside of the discussions here and interviews with the mother, there seems to be no discussion of molestation or particular issues with the child.

Of course, whenever there are custody issues, these types of charges come up.

[AAABEST]

Firstly, the assumption that the judge was "following the law" is nonsense. He could have invoked an array of legal sanctions - jail time and fines among the many. The idea that the judge had his hands tied in the matter, having no choice but to relinquish the child to the non-parent dyke, is simply ridiculous.

Secondly, all Western law is based on God and nature. You've taken love of "the law" (which is almost always a good thing) put it above God and nature, turning the very concept of law on its head. Hence, when your respective states create a law that compels you each must mate with giraffes, I expect you both to comply.

Law means nothing if it simply eminates from the "bright ideas" of men, detached from truth and TRUE justice. Chaos and devolution then become inevitable.

The natural mother doesn't want the child she loves, her own flesh and blood, taking baths with a non-related lesbian the child barely knows. Yet we're being told the only choice the judge had was to tear the child from the mother and give her to the lesbian.

This is collective insanity.

[Twink]

That’s what I’ve read, too. The mother claimed molestation but there was no evidence. Of course, I don’t know all the facts. And as you said, these type of charges come up in custody cases.