My country has gone insane.
1 posted on
01/01/2010 2:04:35 PM PST by
Skooz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Skooz
One of these days, some stupid government employee — a judge, or someone else — is going to mess with a guy named Henry Bowman. And when that happens, I will shout for joy.
2 posted on
01/01/2010 2:06:36 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(We have the 1st so that we can call on people to rebel. We have 2nd so that they can.)
To: Skooz
3 posted on
01/01/2010 2:06:43 PM PST by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
To: Skooz
Hopefully she and Isabella are safely in a country without an extradition treaty, or in a country with only Dual Criminality provisions in the Treaty. (The majority of nations to not have anything close to 18 USC 1204 in their criminal codes.)
Its long past time that people started ignored these activist judges and their immoral edicts.
To: Skooz
It’s only going to get weirder from here on out.
To: Skooz
The Underground Railroad is back in operation.
6 posted on
01/01/2010 2:10:11 PM PST by
6SJ7
(atlasShruggedInd = TRUE)
To: Skooz; All
I’m confused. The woman who gave birth to this child, renounced her homosexual ways, found God and doesn’t want her biological child to be around her ex-lesbian partner is the BAD GUY in this? (That’s the way the media is portraying it, IMHO).
I know they both must be a little mentally ill, but shouldn’t we be rooting for the one who turned her life around? I mean, if we have to root for the lesser of two evils, then Miss Miller is the lesser of two evils.
What am I missing? And why is this any different than say, a woman who later finds out her husband is gay and doesn’t want her children having anything to do with him?
I mean, I don’t think homosexuals should marry, let alone reproduce in the first place, but we are where we are in society in this case, at least. *SHRUG*
8 posted on
01/01/2010 2:12:31 PM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save the Earth. It's the only planet with chocolate.)
To: Skooz
How was the Virginia Supreme Court allowed to get away with this? The Constitution of Virginia is very clear that same sex unions performed anywhere are not legal in Virginia.
9 posted on
01/01/2010 2:12:41 PM PST by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Skooz
The supreme courts of Virginia and Vermont ruled in favor of Jenkins, saying the case was the same as a custody dispute between a heterosexual couple. The case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear arguments on it. No place to hide and Miller cannot even get four members of the SCOTUS to hear her arguments.
10 posted on
01/01/2010 2:12:45 PM PST by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: Skooz
renounced homosexuality and became an evangelical Christian
Ah, that explains it.
11 posted on
01/01/2010 2:13:22 PM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The right thing is not always the popular thing)
To: Skooz
I'm no lawyer but it seems to me that given that VA doesn't recognize homosexual “marriage” no court there is likely to compel the mother to give up the child.The courts of VT can go fornicate themselves.
To: Skooz
Oh sure... just like David Goldman was willing to give up his own son to foreign non-bloodline ‘family’. Blood is thicker than water-— the child should remain with it’s biological mother and God grant her protection. The black-robed tyrant lawyer is an AZZ. Pox on him the fool.
18 posted on
01/01/2010 2:39:40 PM PST by
tflabo
To: Skooz
When the girl was born, were both women listed as parents?
19 posted on
01/01/2010 2:39:56 PM PST by
Cathy
To: Skooz
I know I’d gladly assist the mother in hiding her child from this insane judge and his lackeys if the necessity arose.
24 posted on
01/01/2010 3:03:17 PM PST by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
To: Skooz
What other option does the judge have in this situation - Oh never mind, run off with the child and ignore the custody order that was originally agreed to?
I feel badly for everyone - the mom, the ex and especially the poor child.
27 posted on
01/01/2010 3:08:13 PM PST by
Redgirl
(Capitalism - it does a country good.)
To: Skooz
What about the turkey-baster? Doesn’t it get a vote?
34 posted on
01/01/2010 3:47:32 PM PST by
paddles
To: Skooz
TFB in my book. She wanted the gay lifestyle then she gets all of the treatment that goes with it. Defying the court order for visitation was stupid and the judge did her like he would do anyone else for being in contempt.
42 posted on
01/01/2010 4:11:33 PM PST by
misterrob
(A society that burdens future generations with debt can not be considered moral or just)
To: Skooz
50 posted on
01/01/2010 4:30:16 PM PST by
Ann Archy
(Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Skooz
Heh.. Another one of those stories with nobody to root for.
To: Skooz
This makes the fifth time this story has been posted. Not griping, but a search would find it.
69 posted on
01/01/2010 5:16:47 PM PST by
pctech
To: Skooz
I hope she doesen’t get cold feet and makes a clean break.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson