Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative
I love Yeager, but this is a pretty weak suit.

When you're famous, you don't have the right to say your name can't ever be mentioned.

Bill Clinton. Evel Kneivel. Jimmy J.J. Walker. Chet Atkins. Guy Lombardo. Albert Einstein.

13 posted on 12/31/2009 11:53:00 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dead
I love Yeager, but this is a pretty weak suit.

I agree, however, I think the Virgin is going to be "taken".

14 posted on 12/31/2009 11:55:00 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead
That may be true. The way this is worded, they're not saying that Yeager is endorsing the product (just that he was historic), and Yeager cannot control the reporting of news about him, past or present.

-PJ

15 posted on 12/31/2009 11:55:25 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead
"When you're famous, you don't have the right to say your name can't ever be mentioned."

That is not the issue.

16 posted on 12/31/2009 11:56:07 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead

Is he sold old that $ still matters? There’s a nice 80’s video of his flght sim game on archive.org.

I guess he’s looking out for his heirs, but dang.


17 posted on 12/31/2009 11:57:41 PM PST by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead

I’m with you. This seems ridiculous. A lawyer making work for himself must have dreamt this up.


27 posted on 01/01/2010 2:42:12 AM PST by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead
When you're famous, you don't have the right to say your name can't ever be mentioned.

Actually, a famous person has more rights than the average peon when it comes to using their names for promotion. I think the context here is that he's mentioned as a historical figure. Plus he was a government employee at the time of the event.

I think Virgin is in the clear, and Yeager looks petty.

28 posted on 01/01/2010 4:20:59 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead
When you're famous, you don't have the right to say your name can't ever be mentioned.

Not true.

37 posted on 01/01/2010 5:43:38 AM PST by Ditto (Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead
When you're famous, you don't have the right to say your name can't ever be mentioned.

Try using MLK's name commerically, and see how fast you draw a lawsuit.

The technical ground for the suit would fall under invasion of privacy.

There's an article that might be useful to lay folks here: http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/using-name-or-likeness-another

62 posted on 01/01/2010 8:28:16 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dead
Weak suit? Famous people do ads all the time to support products and services. They get paid for doing so.

The press release essentially said "Buzz Aldrin and Chuck Yeager would fly Virgin Airlines because of the new in-flight WiFi capabilities". These two airmen's names are nowhere near "generic" or in the public domain, so they should be paid for being used as spokesmen without their consent.

82 posted on 01/01/2010 2:37:34 PM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson