Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WayneS; steveo
> A police official warns against it, NOT because one might injure or kill oneself, but because it is a "serious traffic violation". I guess that's to be expected in today's regulation-driven society.

Eh, maybe not. The policeman is not responsible for citizens being sensible, they're responsible for catching citizens who break laws.

There's no law against doing something real damn dumb, unless it's ALSO illegal for a different reason as well.

25 posted on 12/29/2009 12:32:49 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored

That’s a good point.

But then again, why is there a law against Christmas tree surfing in the first place? What if Christmas tree surfing just happens to be one of the sacred rituals of my particular brand of Christianity? Wouldn’t outlawing it be a violation of my rights under the 1st Amendment?

;-)


28 posted on 12/29/2009 12:36:51 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson