Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clyburn will support bill without public option (barf alert)
The Hill ^ | December 27, 2009 | Jordan Fabian

Posted on 12/28/2009 6:46:39 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction

The House's third-ranking Democrat said Sunday that he can support a healthcare reform bill without a public option.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) -- a proponent of a government-run public plan -- said that he could back the bill as long as it creates more choice and competition in the insurance industry and reduces costs. "It's of no consequence" whether it's done via the public option or not.

Asked on CBS' "Face the Nation" if he could back a bill without the public plan, he said "Yes, sir, I can. Because why did we do-- why do we want a public option? We want a public option to do basically three ten-- things: create more choice for insurers, create more competition for insurance companies, and to contain costs."

He continued, "If we can come up with a process by which three-- these three things can be done, then I'm all for it; whether or not we label it a public option or not is of no consequence. What we want to do is get good, effective results from whatever we put in place."

House Democrats have been divided on whether or not they can accept the legislation without a public plan. The Senate passed its version of healthcare reform legislation on Christmas Eve that did not include the government-run plan. The House's version that passed in November did contain the plan favored by liberals.

Some House Democrats have said they would fight hard to include the public plan. House Rules Committee Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) went so far as to say that lawmakers should scrap the bill and start over because the Senate version was so watered down.

But Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Sunday that House Democrats "understand the realities of the Senate."

House and Senate negotiators wiil convene next month to merge the two bills. Other sticking points include the House's stricter abortion language and the Senate's excise tax on high-cost insurance plans versus the House's surtax on high earners.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clyburn; healthcare; jamesclyburn; obamacare

1 posted on 12/28/2009 6:46:41 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

Of course they will support a bill containing no public option. They know that it will be added sometime in the future.


2 posted on 12/28/2009 6:58:49 AM PST by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction
Call the local offices if the DC lines are busy.

US Rep James Clyburn (d)

Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: (803)799-1100

Florence, SC 29506
Phone: (843)662-1212 Santee, SC 29142
Phone: (803)854-4700

N. Charleston, SC 29405 Phone: (843)529-2708

Washington, 20515
Phone: (202)225-3315

3 posted on 12/28/2009 7:00:59 AM PST by GailA (JESUS is Christmas! Cradle in the shadow of a Cross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

One glimmer of light, liberals may not be motivated to vote in 2010 if the house doesn’t fight for the public option.


4 posted on 12/28/2009 8:44:43 AM PST by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson