Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reaganez
Well, it's a valid misunderstanding. But that's all. The permanent apportionment act of 1929 isn't necessarily common knowledge.
14 posted on 12/25/2009 11:23:17 PM PST by eyedigress ( now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: eyedigress

For a Freeper it should be common knowledge.

Come on, everyone here is a politics nerd/junkie.


15 posted on 12/25/2009 11:26:21 PM PST by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: eyedigress
"Well, it's a valid misunderstanding. But that's all. The permanent apportionment act of 1929 isn't necessarily common knowledge."

As far as I am concerned that Piece of legislation should have been struck down. It is clearly not what the founders laid out!

Granted it would mean alot more Congressman but they all would have diminished power because their districts would be smaller!

26 posted on 12/26/2009 12:41:13 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson