To: Reaganez
Well, it's a valid misunderstanding. But that's all. The permanent apportionment act of 1929 isn't necessarily common knowledge.
14 posted on
12/25/2009 11:23:17 PM PST by
eyedigress
( now.)
To: eyedigress
For a Freeper it should be common knowledge.
Come on, everyone here is a politics nerd/junkie.
15 posted on
12/25/2009 11:26:21 PM PST by
Reaganez
To: eyedigress
"Well, it's a valid misunderstanding. But that's all. The permanent apportionment act of 1929 isn't necessarily common knowledge." As far as I am concerned that Piece of legislation should have been struck down. It is clearly not what the founders laid out!
Granted it would mean alot more Congressman but they all would have diminished power because their districts would be smaller!
26 posted on
12/26/2009 12:41:13 AM PST by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson