Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ezfindit
Actually, Darwin didn't address the origin of life, just the origin of species.
12 posted on 12/17/2009 3:57:15 PM PST by colorado tanker (What's it all about, Barrrrry? Is it just for the power, you live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
He delved into the origin of life with later books.

Then went to tend his garden.
19 posted on 12/17/2009 4:35:30 PM PST by NightOfTheLivingDems (Destroy the Dems in Two Thousand Ten, and then some)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker
Actually, Darwin didn't address the origin of life, just the origin of species.

Can you have life without at least one species?

But your right in that his famous theory is about common origin rather than the source of that first species. However, I've read where actually did address the idea of the origin of life, he just had no idea how it could be treated as a scientific theory. He essentially just presumed it somehow emerged from the muck. I have the impression that it wasn't a subject he wrote on often because he didn't want to be labeled a kook by revealing he was a naturalist.

25 posted on 12/17/2009 6:14:28 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson