You need a 2/3 vote to ratify a treaty of the Senate. Any US elected government that attempts to suspend the Consitution is an enemy of it. Our military has sworn an oath to protect it and keep it in place always. This will lead to conflict if Obozo is determined to go down this path.
I agree with your first 3 sentences.
HOW do you imagine this “conflict” would play out?
He seems to be doing a LOT of things that are unconstitutional and nothing is stopping him.
Verrryy frustrating!
I’d like to see an angry million-man-mob march on DC and drag his arse out of the Whitehouse before this is all over.
Get those slimy “bleeps” out of the capitol building while we are at it!
I’ve done more cursing since “that one” became POTUS than I have in my entire life.
I'm afraid your last sentence will come true. I think conflict, probably bloody, will happen before his term is up.
In a perfect world....unfortunately, there are too many RINOs left to ensure failure. Just last year, John McCain was holding forth how our Southwestern desert is proof of climate change. That’s one of those scary things that sticks with you...like John has managed to do with Arizona.
ZeroObama can sign a treaty, but it’s null and void unless ratified by 67 votes in the Senate. So bama could sign but it’s meaningless unless backed by the Senate.
Algore signed the Kyoto document, but Sick Willie never submitted that for ratification. He knew it had no chance.