You can establish a committee to disprove something as easily as you can to prove something.
It seems very important to you that people believe Sarah said something she didn't, even when you are presented with her actual statements. Why is that?
Establishing a “global warming” committee in no way acknowledges MAN CAUSED “global warming”.
On the other hand, the leftists
start from “what do we want to do?” (redistribute wealth, empower elites, control people’s energy consumption, control people, reduce population)
and continue to “how do we do it?” - blaming modern man’s lifestyle for “global warming”
and finally get to “how do we justify it” - faking the data, suppressing dissent, propagandizing the population and especially their kids.
Nice try but I am not going for your bait except to mention the cabinet post was formed in 2007 before Climategate. Sarah’s views have never changed on the subject as many have already mentioned but your so guliable you got reeled in by the media on this. You can try again but you will fail again by the way I will not respond to you again.
a) The impact of warming, regardless of its cause or causes? Natural warming could potentially cause just as much environmental and economic damage as the mythical AGW would.
b) Preparing a state whose economy is heavily dependent upon fossil fuel production, for possible legislation, regulations and taxes, no matter how irrational, from the Federal government, other state governments and the governments of other nations that would negatively affect the Alaskan economy?
Palin seems to have gone from being an agnostic on AGW to a serious skeptic, leaning towards a “denier” (and I mean that in a good way). That is far better than the vast majority of politicians.
Unlike Huckabee and Romney, who don't seem to learn from their mistakes, on pardoning violent felons and socialized medicine respectively, Sarah Palin has reevaluated the the evidence and looked at the new evidence and moved strongly in the right direction on AGW.
Wrong again A-Hole. She established the committee to study the effects of natural, cyclical warming on Alaska’s economy and whether or not there was anything that could be done to mitigate the economic effects of the natural warming to her state’s economy. Are you really this dense?
Doesn't sound liberal to me, just pragmatic. Excuse me, your hate Palin "slip" is showing.
ROFL. Governor Palin never believed or said man caused warming.
The sub-cabinet was created to study the natural, cyclical effects of the climate and what Alaska can do to adapt to it.
A sub-cabinet wholly accountable to the people of Alaska and not to internationalists and envirowackos
Wrong. You can put together a committee to deal with the effects, whatever the cause, so that the economy, jobs and freedoms the people need do not get killed.
Sounds to me that is exactly what she did.