Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats propose $50B for jobs-boosting projects
Business Week ^ | 12/15/09 | ANDREW TAYLOR

Posted on 12/15/2009 9:29:45 PM PST by FromLori

Responding to calls among rank-and-file Democrats for more infrastructure spending, House leaders Tuesday unveiled a plan to add almost $50 billion in spending on highways, housing, and school repair as part of a year-end plan to create jobs.

The measure is aimed at keeping the fragile economic recovery on track with money for teachers, the unemployed and small businesses. A vote is planned for Wednesday.

The Senate, however, won't act until next month at the earliest and has less of an appetite for another costly round of economic stimulus measures.

All told the measure tops $150 billion once additional help for the unemployed and aid to strapped state and local governments is added to provisions designed to have an immediate impact on employment.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: buyingvotes; corruption; democrats; economy; graft; jobs; obama; teachers; teachersunions; theft; unions; votefraud

1 posted on 12/15/2009 9:29:46 PM PST by FromLori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FromLori

2 posted on 12/15/2009 9:34:26 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

If one more liberal friend whines about President Bush and the deficit, POW! right in the kisser.


3 posted on 12/15/2009 9:37:36 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (I'd rather be a AGW denier than a dumbass watermelon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Lemme think. The Messiah got $787 Billion authorized for saving and creating jobs, right? Of course, most of it went to every piss pot pork project imaginable except the bucks he’s saving back to buy votes in 2010. And we should approve more because...?


4 posted on 12/15/2009 9:46:16 PM PST by Rembrandt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

I’ve had it.

It’s torch and pitchfork time.

If there isn’t enough evidence to demonstrate that the libs are trying to deliberately destroy this country, there never will be.

What is it going to take, a nuke from Iran?


5 posted on 12/15/2009 9:55:52 PM PST by Gator113 (Obama is America's First Failed Black Pres-dent.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

This is a rehash of the New Deal. It wasn’t the make-work projects of the New Deal that ended the Depression but the high salaries and forced savings, the employment of 12 million men in the Armed Forces, and the huge demand for American goods after WWII that ended it.


6 posted on 12/15/2009 10:26:55 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

This is a rehash of the New Deal. It wasn’t the make-work projects of the New Deal that ended the Depression but the high salaries and forced savings, the employment of 12 million men in the Armed Forces, and the huge demand for American goods after WWII that ended it.


7 posted on 12/15/2009 10:27:07 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

This is a rehash of the New Deal. It wasn’t the make-work projects of the New Deal that ended the Depression but the high salaries and forced savings, the employment of 12 million men in the Armed Forces, and the huge demand for American goods after WWII that ended it.


8 posted on 12/15/2009 10:27:11 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

This is a rehash of the New Deal. It wasn’t the make-work projects of the New Deal that ended the Depression but the high salaries and forced savings, the employment of 12 million men in the Armed Forces, and the huge demand for American goods after WWII that ended it.


9 posted on 12/15/2009 10:27:13 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Ya, I thought Porkulus was supposed to take care of this.

And, I’ve heard that most of the $787 billion hasn’t been spent yet.

So why is there a need for yet another bill with another huge price tag?


10 posted on 12/15/2009 10:47:06 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

bounce


11 posted on 12/15/2009 10:58:54 PM PST by VOA (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Is there anyone that it is actually tallying up all of these bills’ costs? If there was somewhere prominent that listed all of them in one group and compared them to past spending and necessary spending maybe some would wake up. It would have to be very visual, not confusing, and easily found whether it be online or not.
12 posted on 12/15/2009 11:32:05 PM PST by BadgerHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

What we need is a $1750B cut in deficit spending to boost jobs.


13 posted on 12/16/2009 12:48:13 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

This is awesome in its unhinged-from-reality-ness


14 posted on 12/16/2009 8:26:52 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson