Posted on 12/13/2009 9:29:37 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
fyi
Be AWARE THE SECOND GRAPHS ARE THE AL GORE MISLEADING GRAPHS
Hide the temperature decline:
Hide the Post Middle Age (1600-1800) Mini Ice age:
Hide the Historical CO2 Levels:
Anti-Gigolo-Senator Sarcasm TorpedoTM . FIRE!!
No, he's considering divorcing Teresa and trying to marry Elin Nordegren.
Cheers!
The CO2 increase of the past 300 years was caused by the temperature increase during the Medieval Climate Optimum. To see the effect that our recent slight temperature increase has on atmospheric CO2 levels, we’d have to wait around to about the year 2700AD.
Cheers GW. Heh heh. Whoooo. Then again. I can see it all now!
Yes, this is one of the big facts that all the global warming hoaxers know but don’t like to admit to the public, that rising temperatures increases carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and not the other way around. The mechanism is simple and has been known for quite some time: rising temperatures cause CO2 trapped in rocks to be released into the atmosphere. This fact explains why the CO2 rise lags the warming, and also explains why CO2 levels were higher in the past, long before the industrial age.
[[Ice cores reveal that CO2 levels rise and fall hundreds of years after temperatures changeIn 1985, ice cores extracted from Greenland revealed temperatures and CO2 levels going back 150,000 years.]]
Shhhh- don’t confuse the criminals in the cliamtegate scandal with the FACTS- I’ve been saying htis for a long time now, and so have Inhofe, Marc Morano and many others- however, it has doen no good- because noone is listening- after all, the ‘science is settled’ and that is that- and anyone that dissagrees, or presents coutner evidnece provign otherwise, is a nasty denier to the climategate criminals
>> The CO2 increase of the past 300 years was caused by the temperature increase during the Medieval Climate Optimum.
The delay is counter-intuitive. Is there an explanation of this? Do similar properties exist for other elements?
What’s counter intuitive about it? The largest source and sink of CO2 is the oceans. Cool them down and they absorb gas, warm them up and they release it. They have a huge thermal mass and only respond slowly to warming and cooling.
>> Cool them down and they absorb gas, warm them up and they release it.
But on a 700 year cycle as I understand aruannan’s post?
It would then seem that all of our weather is buffered by the oceans including hurricanes, and it would be virtually impossible to directly affect the climate in our lifetime, or the next. Are we seeing hurricanes that are the result of conditions from centuries ago?
It’s the Idiocy of Not understanding the difference between Tailing Indicators, and Leading Indicators.
When a co-worker arrives, on Monday, with a Cast on his/her foot, that is a Trailing Indicator of a “Ski Weekend”.
Gore’s hockey stick Graph is a trailing indicator, too.
If we don't de-criminalize CO2, we will lose capitalism.
And, the reason the oceans warm and cool is that big flaming ball in the sky, the output of which is constantly varying.....
Does anyone know or know how to find out the total amount of money spent to combat the fictitious ghost of AGW?
this stuff does’nt go away...until those with legitimate economic claims consequent to climate fraud..start suing...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.