Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Governor] Sarah Palin, Dem greens' grinch
The Politico ^ | December 10, 2009 | Glenn Thrush

Posted on 12/10/2009 4:07:48 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Fear the “Barracuda”!


21 posted on 12/10/2009 5:13:37 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown

Another Politico Palin hit piece. Yawn...

- JP


22 posted on 12/10/2009 5:17:45 PM PST by Josh Painter ("We cannot spare this woman. She fights" - David Karki re: Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

A guy named Philip Anschutz produces the “Foundation for a Better Life” commercials that Fox runs frequently. He is a Christian, conservative who happens to be a billionaire and he seems inclined to spend his money to make the world a better place. I believe he owns two movie studios and 6000 theaters. Perhaps he would be interested in project of this nature. The right combination of talent could make of blockbuster with this subject matter.


23 posted on 12/10/2009 5:21:08 PM PST by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Do you think these fools understand they are insulting everyone who agrees with her position against man-made global warming?


24 posted on 12/10/2009 5:21:55 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Obama will sink as fast as he rose. Idolatry will not succeed. Be patient, folks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
rules...


25 posted on 12/10/2009 5:27:31 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Surprise surprise — I see Politburo.com is up to it’s favorite hobby — Palin-bashing


26 posted on 12/10/2009 5:29:31 PM PST by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Progressives, in damage control mode, have quickly countered with an avalanche of untainted peer-reviewed reports pointing to man-made global warming.

No bias here. Move along, folks.

27 posted on 12/10/2009 5:33:42 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (Ram "Health Care Reform" down our throats in '09, and we'll ram it up your @ss in '10.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Time to drag these eco-fascists before an American-style Nuremberg tribunal and administer swift justice to the guilty.


28 posted on 12/10/2009 5:35:40 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

..........using e-mails, many from the 1990s,.......

In attempt to discredit and trivialize, the Politico emphasizes that the fraud is longstanding and very deep.

There is no defense except to trivialize and lie. Thousands of careers are in deep crap


29 posted on 12/10/2009 5:44:11 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Lukenbach Texas is barely there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I’d like to interject two things...

First, that there is indeed “climate change” going on. If there is one thing that we can be sure of, it’s that the climate is going to be different tomorrow from what it was today. It may be hotter or colder or windier or drier - but it won’t be the same...

Secondly, man is part of nature too. Things that man does are just as “natural” as things that any other species does.


30 posted on 12/10/2009 6:12:09 PM PST by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Palin says in the editorial:

“But while we recognize the occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can’t say with assurance that man’s activities cause weather changes.”

She means we aren’t sure yet. She doesn’t claim that there is no man-caused warming.

“We can say, however, that any potential benefits of proposed emissions reduction policies are far outweighed by their economic costs. And those costs are real.”

She means that current proposals to reduce our own carbon emissions won’t signficantly reduce global carbon emissions and would mess up our economy big time.

Too bad this Politico writer doesn’t simply seek the truth and report his findings. Maybe his bosses won’t let him. Maybe, bless his heart, he’s missing the truth-seeking gene.


31 posted on 12/10/2009 6:17:12 PM PST by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson