Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. already $292 bln in the red this year - CBO (Yes We Can!)
Reuters ^ | 12/08/09

Posted on 12/08/2009 12:54:20 PM PST by MissesBush

WASHINGTON, Dec 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. government racked up a gaping shortfall in the first two months of this fiscal year after posting a record budget deficit last year, congressional analysts said on Friday.

In October and November, the government spent $292 billion more than it took in, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said.

That was even worse than the same period last year, when the government was on its way to posting a record $1.4 trillion deficit for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30.

The federal budget has been battered by the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s, as tax revenues have plunged and spending on safety-net programs like unemployment insurance have skyrocketed.

The budget deficit was $176.4 billion in October, according to Treasury Department records, and the CBO estimated the deficit for November will have come in at $115 billion.

The CBO gave its figures in billions of dollars and said numbers may not add up to the totals because of rounding.

Receipts totaled $132 billion in November, the CBO estimated, down 9 percent from the same month last year. That was partly due to new legislation that gives increased tax write-offs to corporations.

Outlays were down $23 billion from a year earlier, the CBO estimated, as the government spent less on federal programs to stem the financial crisis.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; democrats; economy; obama; obamadeficit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Will the media point out the deficit in just the last 2 months exceeded most Bush deficits for the entire year?
1 posted on 12/08/2009 12:54:20 PM PST by MissesBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Bush’s Fault??


2 posted on 12/08/2009 12:55:51 PM PST by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

But of course. Oh, and “the economy’s” fault too if you read the article...of course it has nothing to do with the massive spending coming out of the Obama White House and Congress.


3 posted on 12/08/2009 12:57:28 PM PST by MissesBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


4 posted on 12/08/2009 1:01:00 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

The really sad part of all this is how probable it is that just 1% of the people who voted for Barak Obama (if that many) would even give a damn.


5 posted on 12/08/2009 1:01:10 PM PST by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
Only $292 Billion?
That's not even a Trillion.

You know what they say, "A trillion here and a trillion there, pretty soon you're talking REAL money."

6 posted on 12/08/2009 1:01:24 PM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Don’t cha know obama is gonna spend us right out of this!

Nation must ‘spend our way out of this recession’

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/ap/obama-eyes-bank-bailout-money-to-fund-jobs-bill-to-build-highways-make-homes-energy-efficient-78760722.html

dig that hole all the way to China that’s the plan!


7 posted on 12/08/2009 1:08:45 PM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

proserity is just around the teleprompter...


8 posted on 12/08/2009 1:14:23 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Don’t forget this little comment they made yesterday...

“The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) took a look at that issue and reported today that 10 million people will lose employer health coverage under the present Senate plan “

NICE WORK DEMOCRATS, IN ORDER TO COVER SOME MANY WILL LOSE THEY INSURANCE...YOU ARE A BUNCH OF IDIOTS!

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/12/10-million-to-lose-employer-health-care.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+YidWithLid+(YID+With+LID)


9 posted on 12/09/2009 7:16:15 AM PST by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Look at the bright side, many people thought we would hit the TRILLION deficit mark. It hasn’t happened.


10 posted on 12/09/2009 7:25:46 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; MissesBush
10 million people will lose employer health coverage under the present Senate plan “

Depends on how you look at it.

Actually, they will still be covered by their employer, but the employer (slaveowner) will change: the US government.

11 posted on 12/09/2009 7:26:31 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Margaret Thatcher: “The trouble with Socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”


12 posted on 12/09/2009 7:38:07 AM PST by IrishMike (Liberalism is a psychological disorder and a dangerous mental illness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Please reread my link...it states “”Firms that would choose not to offer coverage as a result of the proposal would tend to be smaller employers and employers that predominantly employ lower-wage workers‚”people who would be eligible for subsidies through the exchange,” The CBO reports, “although some workers who would not have employment-based coverage because of the proposal would not be eligible for such subsidies.” “

See the part that says “”would not be eligible for such subsidies.” “..........Sounds like NO COVERAGE to me.


13 posted on 12/09/2009 7:47:05 AM PST by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
after posting a record budget deficit last year, congressional analysts said on Friday. In October and November, the government spent $292 billion more than it took in, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said.

That's because in November Bush signed on WITH Office Of The President Elect Obama for Paulson's "emergency bailout" spending.

14 posted on 12/09/2009 8:12:43 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Well the stock market is just a tracking poll, don’t you know?


15 posted on 12/09/2009 8:13:54 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

We can’t possibly dig to China because, as Algore has made clear, (this is settled science)the Earth’s innards are millions of degrees in temperature.


16 posted on 12/09/2009 9:11:27 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hasn’t happened YET. Keep in mind this is only for the first 2 months of the new fiscal year, October and November. In two months they ran up almost 300 billion in deficit! That’s a lot more than most entire years during the Bush admin.


17 posted on 12/09/2009 9:14:05 AM PST by MissesBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

The *silent* tax revolt is beginning to show.


18 posted on 12/09/2009 9:17:05 AM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
In October and November, the government spent $292 billion more than it took in

Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/

text describing the image
19 posted on 12/09/2009 10:07:57 AM PST by Son House (The Learning Curve for Democrats on Macroeconomics is getting Exponential)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

All wars are economic in basis. Obama is winning. Soon the USA will be conquered


20 posted on 12/09/2009 11:57:50 AM PST by KTM rider ( ..........tell me this really isn't happening ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson