Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy

A) No one said anyone was going to ‘get anything’, but the active ingredient is there, whether you want to acknowledge it or not.

B) Here are the resources to the information.

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/there-are-drugs-in-drinking-water-now-what/

http://www.ucowr.siu.edu/updates/pdfn/V120_A1.pdf

Ok, so now we have accepted (I have, you can doubt it all you want) that there are residues of the active chemicals of medicine in water. No one, not me, not the article I posted, nothing said that you could “get anything” from it. If you had read the article, you would see that the problem is the fear that the virus will become immune to Tamiflu, or the main ingredient in Tamiflu.


10 posted on 12/08/2009 1:04:59 PM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: autumnraine

I think you missed my point. Saying Tamiflu is there is like saying that there is bird poop in the water you drink. Yes, there is. Fish screw in it too so there is fish sperm in the water. The point is that it really doesn’t matter. It doesn’t appear in substantial quantities to mean anything.


12 posted on 12/08/2009 5:06:31 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson