Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay advocates see bloodbath for New York Dem 'no' voters
Daily News ^ | December 7, 2009 | Elizabeth Benjamin

Posted on 12/07/2009 6:23:36 AM PST by NYer


Gay advocates will push to replace freshman Sen. Joseph Addabbo.

Gay advocates are on the warpath after the state Senate killed same-sex marriage last week, and few Democratic senators who voted against the bill are safe from their wrath.

After spending more than $1 million to help the Democrats retake the chamber for the first time in decades, powerful gay activists and donors say they'll support challengers against anti-gay-marriage senators in 2010.

"It's going to be a bloodbath," one gay operative predicted. "We're going to use every single weapon in our quiver to take these people out. We either need to replace them or scare the hell out of them so they do the right thing."

Gay activists are considered some of the most effective fund-raisers in state Democratic political circles.

"The community is apoplectic ... and the commitment to building the Democratic majority is over," the operative added. "We won't make the same mistake twice."

That doesn't mean gay support will automatically be shifted to the Senate Republicans, who are mounting a campaign to take back the majority next fall.

The GOP failed to provide a single "yes" vote when the marriage bill was defeated, 38-24, last week.

But most of the rage is focused on the Democrats, particularly the eight senators who joined the GOP in voting "no." Of the eight, freshman Queens Sen. Joe Addabbo is target No. 1.

Also in the advocates' crosshairs: Sens. Shirley Huntley and George Onorato, both of Queens, and Sen. Bill Stachowski of Buffalo.

Huntley survived a primary challenge from former Councilman Allan Jennings last year. So far, no one has formally come forward to take her on in 2010.

Democratic Assemblyman Mike Gianaris and outgoing Councilman Eric Gioia have been mentioned as possible opponents to Onorato.

Sen. Darrel Aubertine, a conservative upstater, was never considered a possible "yes," and thus is safer than some of his fellow "no" voters. Ditto for Sen. Ruben Diaz Sr. of the Bronx, although advocates would like to recruit an opponent for him.

Gay advocates tried to get Councilman Lew Fidler to challenge Brooklyn Democrat Sen. Carl Kruger, who voted "no," but Fidler declined. Kruger would be tough to beat because he heads the powerful Senate Finance Committee and has $2 million in his campaign account .

Embattled Queens Sen. Hiram Monserrate, who faces possible expulsion by his colleagues for assaulting his girlfriend, was a surprise "no" vote.

He already has a primary challenger in Assemblyman Jose Peralta, who is backed by party leaders and has voted for gay marriage in the past.

- Real Estate Board of New York President Steven Spinola is putting his enrollment where his mouth is. Sources confirm the trade association head ditched the Democratic Party and signed up with the state Independence Party, which he is trying to build into a pro-business coalition to counter the powerful labor-backed Working Families Party.

State Independence Party Chairman Frank MacKay said he's thrilled about his newest member and hopes Spinola will take on a leadership role.

"I'm hoping Steve will attract more like him," MacKay said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: addabbo; christianright; complainers; gaymarriage; gaystapo; homonaziagenda; homonazis; homonazism; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; ny2010; whiners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2009 6:23:36 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz; skully; The Mayor

Ping!


2 posted on 12/07/2009 6:24:53 AM PST by NYer ("One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone" - Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Queens target Queens...


3 posted on 12/07/2009 6:26:06 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Looks like the Democrat “big tent” is caving in a little...


4 posted on 12/07/2009 6:26:10 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The homos are bent out of shape.


5 posted on 12/07/2009 6:26:42 AM PST by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
The GOP failed to provide a single "yes" vote when the marriage bill was defeated, 38-24, last week.

Good!!!

Hey here's an idea why not leave it to the voters via referendum. Oh can't do that because every time that's been done, even in liberal Oregon it goes down by huge margins.

6 posted on 12/07/2009 6:27:42 AM PST by YankeeReb (There's no such thing as Free Health care OR a JOBLESS RECOVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

they dont plan to keep taking it in the rear!


7 posted on 12/07/2009 6:31:09 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied, the economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; fieldmarshaldj; Impy
George Onorato

Onorato is my State Senator. He will likely be retiring next time around, as he is in his 80s. The district interestingly enough does have a growing gay population (who are part of the hipster douchebag flood that has occurred over the past five years), and the old timers that were George's base (economically leftist, but center-right on many social issues) are moving to the graveyards. Methinks Gianaris will replace him.

8 posted on 12/07/2009 6:32:10 AM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb
I'm not a fan of "rule by referendum" as the sheeple will often vote us into slavery, and it is an affront to our constitutional Republic. Besides, if you think NY's gun laws are strict now, just see what would happen if we had mobocracy in this state due to referendum.

In a constitutional Republic, it is up to the people to put pressure on their legislators to defeat noxious legislation.

9 posted on 12/07/2009 6:34:31 AM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"We're going to use every single weapon in our quiver to take these people out. We either need to replace them or scare the hell out of them so they do the right thing."

If I've said it once, I've said it a million times. They should be put back in the mental institutions. They never should have been let out in the first place. There's something seriously wrong with these people.
No one wants anything to do with their vile fetish. That's just the way it is.

10 posted on 12/07/2009 6:34:41 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I hope they do nominate pro-gay nutbags. The GOP will easily retake the Senate if they do. Catholic and immigrant communities in Queens and Brooklyn do NOT want SSM.


11 posted on 12/07/2009 6:41:27 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“We’re going to use every single weapon in our quiver to take these people out.”

Why does this sound incredibly icky? Like, “Put your weapon back in your pants and go quiver somewhere else, before I call a cop!”


12 posted on 12/07/2009 6:43:44 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb; massmike
Hey here's an idea why not leave it to the voters via referendum.

That would be too democratic. ;-)

13 posted on 12/07/2009 6:48:08 AM PST by NYer ("One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone" - Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer
They can keep dreaming.

When it comes down to it, minority voters don't much cotton to the sodomy deathstyle and if given a chance, will vote it down every time.
14 posted on 12/07/2009 6:50:40 AM PST by Antoninus (The RNC's dream ticket: Romney / Scozzafava 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Somehow gays being on the warpath sounds a bit queer to me.


15 posted on 12/07/2009 6:54:26 AM PST by Leg Olam (Make yourselves sheep, and the wolves will eat you. - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; NYer
When it comes down to it, minority voters don't much cotton to the sodomy deathstyle and if given a chance, will vote it down every time.

Gays could raise all the money they want at their "tea parties/dances" and have everyone in Manhattan, and parts of Brooklyn (Williamsburg and Park Slope come to mind) tell them how "fabulous" they are. Darnell Jackson in St. Albans and South Jamaica, and Jose Beltran in Corona or Jackson Heights ain't buying it, however.

The gays have a "people of color"/ethnic issue that they are too scare to address publicly.

16 posted on 12/07/2009 6:58:21 AM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"It's going to be a bloodbath," one gay operative predicted.

Hate Crime? Oooops! No, that's only if we say that towards them.

17 posted on 12/07/2009 7:07:11 AM PST by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
The gays think they own the Democrat Party. So does George Soros. And the welfare queens. And the racial greivance gimme lobby. And the no nukes kooks. And the Islamofacists, who may vote with gays but would sooner murder them.

This is exactly what happens when too many log cabins crowd into one big tent.

18 posted on 12/07/2009 7:10:59 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer

In reality just a few bad apple gays are pushing for marriage. The majority don’t think it’s a good idea.


19 posted on 12/07/2009 7:14:40 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty; NYer
In reality just a few bad apple gays are pushing for marriage. The majority don’t think it’s a good idea.

Here in New York, that is not the case. Even though most gays in the area don't have any intention to get married (this has been shown in polls), they view the marriage vote as another step toward full civil rights.

20 posted on 12/07/2009 7:20:49 AM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson