Replies

"No, you have not substantiated in any way shape or form that Einstein bought into your notion that the Earth was at the center of gravity for the universe, or that this would in any way cause the Sun to orbit the Earth."

I have substantiated that geocentrism is equivalent to geokineticism under GR.

"All you did was blather on uselessly about coordinate systems after I had repeatedly acknowledged that they were equivalent as coordinate systems."

Again, trying to label opposing models with emotionally-charged terms and accusations is a fool's errand.

"But I expect nothing less than you to repeat the same tired old quotes about them being equivalent as coordinate systems, what else can you do now that you are caught in a lie?"

And we can expect nothing less than you to continue to deny that geocentrism is physically and observationally equivalent to geokineticism in the face of knowledgeable scientists who are telling you differently.

Again, trying to label opposing models with emotionally-charged terms and accusations is a fool's errand.

The argument was not about if they were equivalent under GR as coordinate systems, and it never was.

Your lie was that Einstein bought into your ‘Earth at the center of gravity of the universe’ model. That is absolutely not “according to Einstein”, when you suggested that your model was “according to Einstein” you lied.

Neither have you substantiated this supposed ‘gravity imbalance’ by any peer reviewed literature or equations that would show your model to even be possible.

There is nothing magical about being at the center of gravity that would keep the Earth at the center of gravity. The gravity between the Sun and Earth would still cause an orbital acceleration on the Earth unless countered continually by an equal and opposite force.

No wonder you are so reluctant to state your actual model, it is moronic, not supported by physics, not in the peer reviewed literature and absolutely NOT “according to Einstein”.