Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Presbyterian Reporter
I do not believe that carbon emissions contribute much to changes in the climate. Nor do I believe that mankind "is responsible" for bad weather, climate trends, etc. But I do believe that we need to develop other sources of energy other than fossil fuels and to preserve as much of our resources as is economically feasible.

That said, if I were a proponent of AGW, rather than downplay or try to explain their actions away, I would be furious at the scientist/researchers/media/politicians who are part of this fraud. The damage to the environmental movement over this is going to be hard to recover from. Serious environmental issues are now likely to be dismissed or flat-out disbelieved.

15 posted on 12/02/2009 11:43:53 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GSWarrior

How many “environmentalists” do you believe are more concerned about the “erf” and the environment

than they are concerned about promoting a global socialist agenda?

In other words, they won’t be really mad about this except for the fact that “they were THIS close”...


16 posted on 12/02/2009 11:47:31 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson