Posted on 11/23/2009 6:34:43 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves
if what you say is correct, I *am* glad they are using US workers.
But why not use a US firm, since (presumably) using US workers eliminates the wage arbitrage which is the "excuse of first resort" when outsourcing; and using a US firm would keep the money flowing in the US economy...?
Cheers!
As far as I am concerned, it’s not a matter of fairness, it’s a matter of trust. I don’t believe the Chinese are trustworthy. I’m tired of hearing stories about Chinese drywall, lead in children’s toys, melanin in baby formula, toxic toothpaste, tainted animal feed, and on and on. And don’t get me started on Chinese made steel. They will do anything to make a buck from the US.
The unit prices for the items of work reflect the respective bidders ( Contractors)internal production histories. Everyone pays the same for labor and equipment, the materials are the same...production is the wild card, it determines your cost. The “Profit” is the contingency you add for risk...sometimes more than 50% of you labor cost, if the job has problems and takes longer...your labor increases.
The labor in NYC is all Union, you are not going to bring in foreign workers on visa's.
How would the money not flow into the U.S. economy?
The NYC construction market is a very tough and competitive one, not for beginners. The Owners are very quality conscious and demanding, the inspection is tops, I know I am a Heavy Construction Contractor working in NYC.
Cheers!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.