[metmom]

You want to replace facts with belief. It is you who is taking the liberal position.

That is not what defines a liberal.

But if that's what you feel it takes to excuse yourself from wearing the label you deserve, you'll convince yourself of that.

Advocating for government control of education or anything else for that matter, no matter how good a reason you think you have and how much you think you can justify it, is a liberal position.

Conservative values are freedom OF and for religion, not freedom FROM religion and freedom from federal government control.

You've also provided absolutely no evidence that teaching creation would harm science education in this country. You've completely ducked the question, instead again, trying to change the topic and get the focus off your failure by attacking me again.

I find it rather amusing that evos, who appeal to statistics and *mountains of evidence*, totally ignore the mountains of evidence that teaching creation will NOT hurt science education. So much for being objective.

[MrB]

Anyone want to bet on the outcome of science testing an

average homeschooler taught from the standpoint of creationism

vs

an average public schooler taught nothing but evolution?

Didn’t think so.

So, who’s harming “science education”?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!