Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maverick68
Absolutely. The Constitution recognizes the right to keep and bear arms. It does not grant such a right. The opinion of the courts does not count.

And oh by the way, automatic weapons are protected just as much as semi-automatic. If a soldier can carry it into battle, it should be available for home use.

9 posted on 11/17/2009 11:03:36 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
And oh by the way, automatic weapons are protected just as much as semi-automatic. If a soldier can carry it into battle, it should be available for home use.

In fact, at the time of the revolution and writing of the Constitution, the citizens had more advanced fire arms than did the military.

12 posted on 11/17/2009 11:07:12 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
"If a soldier can carry it into battle, it should be available for home use. "

I believe you are limiting your options with a statement like that.

If I have to acquire a modern truck to pull my old 12 pounder to the front, why can I not procure a modern howitzer and do the same?

Just ask-en mind you. I'm gonna keep the howitzer no mater what.

20 posted on 11/17/2009 4:12:52 PM PST by An Old Man (Use it up, Wear it out, Make it do, or Do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson