Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gates Lashes Out at Leakers
American Forces Press Service ^ | Donna Miles

Posted on 11/12/2009 3:54:06 PM PST by SandRat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2009 3:54:10 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Its called politics, Gates, get with the program.


2 posted on 11/12/2009 3:55:00 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Whats a little leakage between friends there big guy?


3 posted on 11/12/2009 3:55:16 PM PST by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
He refrained from sharing his own views about the best option, but said Obama appears to be leaning toward one that combines parts of various alternatives presented so far.

Clever, then he can pick and choose the blame when things go wrong.

Sickening.

4 posted on 11/12/2009 3:57:29 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"Everybody out there with their own little piece of the action" doesn't understand how it fits into the big picture, he said. "Everybody out there ought to just shut up."

Obama taught him well.

5 posted on 11/12/2009 3:58:33 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (Socialism is the plundering of the productive by the unaccountable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Hey Gates : Daniel Ellsburg, Pentagon Papers ring a bell?


6 posted on 11/12/2009 3:59:04 PM PST by alpo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Betcha Barry chewed Gates’ butt over the leaks about his dithering on Afghanistan. Makes Barry look bad, as it should.
7 posted on 11/12/2009 3:59:21 PM PST by colorado tanker (What's it all about, Barrrrry? Is it just for the power, you live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
While I'm all fro the leaks coming out about the Afghanistan war, I'm going to side with Gates with respect to the Ft. Hood terrorist. These leaks could theoretically compromise the prosecution's case. And, they could come back to bite the prosecution on appeal, well after Obama leaves office.

As much as I'd like to know about this shooter, I'm hoping the leaks on his case stop, quickly.

8 posted on 11/12/2009 4:00:08 PM PST by OldDeckHand (Obamacare - So bad, even Joe Lieberman isn't going to vote for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I am appalled he is the Secretary of Defense — does that count?


9 posted on 11/12/2009 4:02:22 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Compromise the case against a cold-blooded, murdering terrorist?

What appeals court would order that guy released on a technicality?

10 posted on 11/12/2009 4:03:33 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

WOW

Be a shame if we knew what was going on within our only country...wouldnt it...


11 posted on 11/12/2009 4:04:17 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Yo, Robby, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this stuff out. Besides, didn’t your boss promise transparency?


12 posted on 11/12/2009 4:05:04 PM PST by bgill (The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Someone needs to tell the truth, Gates.


13 posted on 11/12/2009 4:05:33 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

“Everybody out there ought to just shut up.”

Yawn. Another politician telling the restless peasants to just shut up.

Well, I didn’t shut up: I sent this worthless numbnuts an email sharing a piece of my mind the other day after his Fort Hood statement.


14 posted on 11/12/2009 4:05:43 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Leaking is negatively correlated with trust. Since many of the DOD personnel don’t trust the 0bama administration there will be lots of leaks.

If the DOD had not tried to blow smoke up everyone’s butts on who Hasan was and their own incompetence there would not be as much motivation to leak. If 0bama had not had 8 briefings about Afghanistan and still unwilling to make a decision, there would not be leaks by people frustrated with his ditherings.

The only problems I had with leaks in the Bush administration were when they endangered the lives of our soldiers or citizens by providing information or incentives to our enemies.


15 posted on 11/12/2009 4:08:08 PM PST by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts soooo good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

“The question, he said, comes down to “How do we signal resolve, and at the same time, signal to the Afghans and the American people that this is not open-ended?”

Send a telegram...or in today’s world, text them!

Do NOT ‘send signals’ with American lives!


16 posted on 11/12/2009 4:08:20 PM PST by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Gates. Go shine Obama’s shoes.
17 posted on 11/12/2009 4:08:26 PM PST by McGruff (We're Going Rogue Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
"What appeals court would order that guy released on a technicality? "

I don't think he'd walk, but appellate courts seem to be always looking for ways to set aside a DP sentence. The prosecution in this capital case, like all capital cases, has to be as "clean" as possible.

And, don't forget that unlike the civilian court, in military court, the prosecution has to avoid something called "unlawful command influence". If HQDA, DOD, SecDef or even the President were seen as trying to influence the jury or public opinion, it would be grounds for appeal. The defense already made comments as such just a few days ago - like all defense attorneys in military capital cases, UCI is their best friend.

18 posted on 11/12/2009 4:09:38 PM PST by OldDeckHand (Obamacare - So bad, even Joe Lieberman isn't going to vote for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Where ya been? It’s journalistic currency. In Washington, leaks are the coin of the realm.


19 posted on 11/12/2009 4:18:05 PM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I’d never seen so much leaking as when Bush was Pres. Not a whole lot was done about it then, so good luck.


20 posted on 11/12/2009 4:22:42 PM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson